Why they don't increase altitude of ISS to overcome drag

AI Thread Summary
Increasing the altitude of the International Space Station (ISS) to reduce atmospheric drag is complicated by several factors. Higher altitudes would limit the cargo capacity of visiting vehicles, although it would decrease the amount of propellant needed for resupply missions. Additionally, the risk of exposure to orbital debris and cosmic radiation increases with altitude, posing long-term health risks to crew members. Current operations balance the need for propellant efficiency, vehicle capabilities, and crew safety, with the ISS maintained at a lower altitude to optimize these factors. Ultimately, the decision to keep the ISS at its current altitude is based on a careful assessment of these competing considerations.
abhaybakshi
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Experts -

Why they don't increase altitude of ISS to overcome slight atmospheric drag it faces. Due to this, they need to make altitude corrections frequently to ISS.

I want to know, why they can not put ISS in higher orbit where there is almost nil atmospheric drag (or may be altitude corrections are required once in 4-5 years...). Will it not be more fuel efficient approach ?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
from this NASA page ...
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/expeditions/expedition26/iss_altitude.html

Raising the space station’s altitude means that visiting vehicles will not be able to carry as much cargo as they could if they were launching to the station at a lower altitude, but it also means that not as much of that cargo needs to be propellant.

Other considerations include the amount of orbital debris, or space junk, at these different altitudes, and the amount of solar and cosmic radiation to which astronauts and cosmonauts are exposed.

Crew exposure to radiation can be a long-term health issue for crew members, a subject that doctors and researchers are learning more about as each crew member lives and works aboard the station and increases the pool of information on this important topic for future space exploration beyond low-Earth orbit, where it will be an even bigger concern since Earth is protected from much of this cosmic radiation by the Van Allen Belts, which are outside the station’s orbit.

“What we are balancing against this increase in altitude is vehicle capabilities to get to that altitude, how much cargo they can deliver, crew radiation exposure and orbital debris risk,” Spetch said. “Essentially, we want to fly as low as we can support from a propellant resupply standpoint and that altitude increases with solar cycle activity. Also key to us being so low now was taking full advantage of the cargo delivered by space shuttles. Otherwise we would be flying slightly higher now.”
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes Imager and abhaybakshi
Thanks Davenn. That answers everything.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top