Why they don't increase altitude of ISS to overcome drag

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The International Space Station (ISS) remains at a lower altitude primarily due to the balance of several critical factors, including cargo capacity of visiting vehicles, crew radiation exposure, and the risk of orbital debris. Increasing the ISS's altitude would reduce atmospheric drag but would also limit the amount of cargo that can be delivered by resupply missions. Experts emphasize that maintaining a lower orbit allows for optimal propellant efficiency and takes advantage of the capabilities of vehicles like the Space Shuttle. The decision is influenced by solar cycle activity and the need to mitigate long-term health risks associated with radiation exposure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orbital mechanics and altitude effects
  • Knowledge of cargo capacity limitations for spacecraft
  • Familiarity with radiation exposure risks in space
  • Awareness of orbital debris and its implications for space missions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of solar cycle activity on satellite operations
  • Explore the effects of radiation exposure on astronauts in low-Earth orbit
  • Investigate the design and capabilities of current resupply vehicles for the ISS
  • Learn about strategies for managing orbital debris in space missions
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, space mission planners, researchers in space health, and anyone involved in the logistics of space exploration will benefit from this discussion.

abhaybakshi
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Experts -

Why they don't increase altitude of ISS to overcome slight atmospheric drag it faces. Due to this, they need to make altitude corrections frequently to ISS.

I want to know, why they can not put ISS in higher orbit where there is almost nil atmospheric drag (or may be altitude corrections are required once in 4-5 years...). Will it not be more fuel efficient approach ?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
from this NASA page ...
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/expeditions/expedition26/iss_altitude.html

Raising the space station’s altitude means that visiting vehicles will not be able to carry as much cargo as they could if they were launching to the station at a lower altitude, but it also means that not as much of that cargo needs to be propellant.

Other considerations include the amount of orbital debris, or space junk, at these different altitudes, and the amount of solar and cosmic radiation to which astronauts and cosmonauts are exposed.

Crew exposure to radiation can be a long-term health issue for crew members, a subject that doctors and researchers are learning more about as each crew member lives and works aboard the station and increases the pool of information on this important topic for future space exploration beyond low-Earth orbit, where it will be an even bigger concern since Earth is protected from much of this cosmic radiation by the Van Allen Belts, which are outside the station’s orbit.

“What we are balancing against this increase in altitude is vehicle capabilities to get to that altitude, how much cargo they can deliver, crew radiation exposure and orbital debris risk,” Spetch said. “Essentially, we want to fly as low as we can support from a propellant resupply standpoint and that altitude increases with solar cycle activity. Also key to us being so low now was taking full advantage of the cargo delivered by space shuttles. Otherwise we would be flying slightly higher now.”
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Imager and abhaybakshi
Thanks Davenn. That answers everything.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K