Why we cannot solve quantum sho directly by fro envious series.

wowowo2006
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have just learned the quantum harmonic oscillator
When we start to Solve the schodinger equation. y"= (K - x^2) y
We look at large x behaviour and use a substitution y = u(x)* exp(-x^2 /2)
to approximate the large x behaviour first,
then we use series method to solve the equation which is in terms of u(x)

I wonder if we can use power series or froenvious series to solve the equation at the very beginning
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you don't believe your teachers or the textbook authors, there is no reason for you to believe us.
You only have one option remaining: try it and see ;)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top