Why's Potential Difference Different in Series Capacitors?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that in a series connection of capacitors, all plates have the same charge, leading to different potential differences unless the capacitances are identical. If the capacitors have equal capacitance, their potential differences will also be equal, aligning with the book's explanation. The relationship between charge, capacitance, and voltage is emphasized, with capacitance defined as the ratio of charge to voltage. The total capacitance in series is derived from the individual capacitances, confirming that the potentials across capacitors add up. Understanding these principles allows for accurate calculations of voltage across individual capacitors in series.
taco01
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
My book says "the magnitude of charge on all plates in a series connection is the same." It then says "potential differences of the individual capacitors are not the same unless their individual capacitances are the same." If the plates were all the same size, given that they all have equal charge, their capacitances would be the same, and therefore the potential differences of the individual capacitors would also be the same, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That seems to agree with what the book says — if the capacitance are the same, then the potential differences are the same.
 
If you have two capacitances in series, the potentials add and the magnitude of the charges on the plates are all the same. Thus you have
$$U_1+U_2=U \; \Rightarrow \; Q \left (\frac{1}{C_1}+\frac{1}{C_2} \right)=\frac{Q}{C} \; \Rightarrow \; \frac{1}{C_1}+\frac{1}{C_2}=\frac{1}{C},$$
i.e., you get the rule for the total capacitance of two capacitors in series. Now indeed
$$U_1=\frac{C}{C_1} U = \frac{C_2}{C_1+C_2} U, \quad U_2=\frac{C}{C_2}U=\frac{C_1}{C_1+C_2} U.$$
 
First understand that capacitance, C is defined as the ratio of charge, Q to voltage V.
C = Q / V
V = Q / C
Next understand that the charge Q, on capacitors in series is the same on each capacitor.

From that you can calculate the voltage across individual capacitors in series.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top