Wick's Theorm to Feynman Diagrams?

pudilz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is this right? To calculate a scattering amplitude for a certain scattering event, you take the term in the wick's expansion of the S-Matrix that suits your situation best. Then you draw a Feynman Diagram that corresponds to the term in the wick's expansion, then just use the Feynman Rules to compute the amplitude. Let's just say for example, you have two free ,spin zero, quantum field theory's given by their Lagrangian Densities.

L_{real} = \partial_{\mu}\varphi\partial^{\mu}\varphi -m^{2}\varphi^{2}
L_{complex} = \partial_{\mu}\psi\partial^{\mu}\psi^{\dag} - M^{2}\psi^{\dag}\psi

And Let's just say for pure example the interaction Hamiltonian between these two fields is:

H_{int} = g\int d^{3}x\psi^{\dag}\psi\varphi

Where \psi^{\dag} is the Hermitian Conjugate. From that we can get the S-Matrix:

S = Texp(-ig\int d^{4}x \psi^{\dag}\psi\varphi)

Where T is the Time-Ordering operator. For ease I'll only go to order g^{2} for the S-Matrix expansion. So the S-Matrix will be:

S = (-ig)^{2}\int d^{4}xd^{4}yT[\psi^{\dag}(x)\psi(x)\varphi(x)\psi^{\dag}(y)\psi(y)\varphi(y)]

Using Wick's Theorem, we can calculate

T[\psi^{\dag}(x)\psi(x)\varphi(x)\psi^{\dag}(y)\psi(y)\varphi(y)]

To Be 3 different terms:

N[\psi^{\dag}(x)\psi(x)\psi^{\dag}(y)\psi(y)]\varphi(x)\varphi(y) + N[\psi^{\dag}(x)\varphi(x)\psi(y)\varphi(y)]\psi(x)\psi^{\dag}(y) + N[\psi(x)\varphi(x)\psi^{\dag}(y)\varphi(y)]\psi^{\dag}(x)\psi(y)

Where \varphi(x)\varphi(y) is contraction/propagator for the \varphi particle to go from x to y, likewise for the other two. N is the Normal Ordering Operator.

Now let's say we have some sort of scattering event between the \varphi and the \psi^{\dag}\psi particles. To get the Amplitude we choose one of the terms in the Wick's expansions that satisfies the initial state the best, draw out the Feynman Diagram being in 1-1 correspondence with the term selected, and then use the Feynman Rules to compute the Amplitude.

Is this right, or somewhat on track? Or I'm I just hopelessly lost and confused?

p.s
I can absolutely assure you this is NOT any type of homework assignment.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm just trying to get a better understanding of how to calculate scattering amplitudes. Yes, this is correct. You have provided a good explanation of how to calculate the scattering amplitude for the given scattering event.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top