I Width of Spectrum produced by a prism?

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the width of the spectrum produced by a prism involves understanding both the frequency content and the visible color spread of light. The spectrum's frequency content remains unchanged after passing through the prism, while the visible color spread depends on the distance to the observation plane and its tilt. To simplify calculations, focusing on the angular spread is recommended. The refractive index varies with wavelength, impacting the dispersion of colors, which can be characterized using the Abbe number. Applying Snell's law with the appropriate parameters allows for accurate determination of the spectrum's characteristics.
itsnaresh
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
How to calculate the width of spectrum produced by a dispersive prism of a given apex angle and refractive index, of white light of given width incident on first face of prism?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If by spectrum you mean the frequency content of the light, then the spectrum width after passing through the prism is the same as that before entering it, assuming the propagation inside the prism is of linear nature. On the other hand, if you mean the width of the visible color spread, which is not the same as the spectrum defined previously, then you also need to specify the distance from prism back surface to the observation plane and the tilt of this plane. Rather than going through the trouble of specifying these parameters, it's much simpler to calculate the angular spread instead.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Thank you very much for your reply. I am attaching below two pictures. The top picture shows the spectrum produced on a screen by a prism when white light is incident on its first face. Spectrum produced on the screen has distinct widths of various colors from red to blue. I want to know how we can calculate these widths of various colors when a collimated beam of white light is incident. The second pictures shows the layout of the system. I can work out the dispersion for various colours having different colours for a single ray. But I can not work out for the beam. Actually I want to design a wavelength scale for this system. The parameters Fo, D and X can be fixed based on the calculations.

UOI9SJUk_HOcvBsXOphVf6Okpb7rtSUD5bGUKriQEWHOVfM0ETeGrqU8P_gBK_2OeaaPCvGhz_7De7ZjseyB=w1024-h635.jpg
 

Attachments

  • UOI9SJUk_HOcvBsXOphVf6Okpb7rtSUD5bGUKriQEWHOVfM0ETeGrqU8P_gBK_2OeaaPCvGhz_7De7ZjseyB=w1024-h635.jpg
    UOI9SJUk_HOcvBsXOphVf6Okpb7rtSUD5bGUKriQEWHOVfM0ETeGrqU8P_gBK_2OeaaPCvGhz_7De7ZjseyB=w1024-h635.jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 855
You list a single refractive index, but of course the refractive index depends on the wavelength. The diffraction angle is just given by Snell's law. ##n_1 \sin \theta_1 = n_2 \sin \theta_2##.

The Abbe number approximately characterizes the dispersion with just a single number.
Looking at this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbe_number#/media/File:Abbe-diagram_2.svg , it looks like the Abbe number for SF1 is around 29.5.
Wikipedia says
##V_D = \frac{n_D-1}{n_F-n_C}##
where nD, nF and nC are the refractive indices of the material at the wavelengths of the Fraunhofer D-, F- and C- spectral lines (589.3 nm, 486.1 nm and 656.3 nm respectively)
So, that means
##29.5 \approx \frac{1.717295-1}{n(486.1)-n(656.3)}##
##n(486.1)-n(656.3) \approx 0.024315##
##\frac{dn}{d\lambda} \approx -1.4286 \times 10^{-4} \mathrm{cm}^{-1}##
Just plug that into Snell's law based on the geometry of your prism.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top