Wigner-Eckart theorem and reduced matrix element

Tilde90
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Wigner-Eckart theorem and "reduced matrix element"

Hello,

I am studying the Wigner-Eckart theorem and I have found some difficulties understanding the reduced matrix element of a spherical tensor.
In fact, a spherical tensor is commonly defined through its transformation properties, and I imagine it as a "vector of angular operators": the Wigner-Eckart theorem evaluates one matrix element of a component of this vector. However, I cannot understand the meaning of the reduced matrix element involved in the expression of the theorem.
Please, could you explain to me the "idea" behind it, or where is the mistake in my idea of spherical tensors (if there is a mistake)?

Thank you very much for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have same problems
 
The point is that you only have to calculate only one matrix element -- in most cases, the one with maximal ##M_J## is easiest to calculate -- divide it by the corresponding Clebsch-Gordan coefficient to get the reduced matrix element. From this you can calculate all the other matrix elements by multiplication with the corresponding CG coefficients.
 
Thank you
DrDu said:
The point is that you only have to calculate only one matrix element -- in most cases, the one with maximal ##M_J## is easiest to calculate -- divide it by the corresponding Clebsch-Gordan coefficient to get the reduced matrix element. From this you can calculate all the other matrix elements by multiplication with the corresponding CG coefficients.
Thank you do you have problems for this theory
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top