Will a Rolling Ball on a Level Surface Ever Stop?

AI Thread Summary
A ball rolling on a level surface will eventually stop due to friction, despite the textbook model suggesting no acceleration on a flat plane. The model assumes zero friction and energy loss, which does not reflect real-world conditions. In reality, rolling involves energy conversion to heat and drag as the ball interacts with the surface. Additionally, the contact area between the ball and the ground creates a restoring torque that contributes to slowing down the motion. Thus, the idealized model fails to account for these factors, leading to the conclusion that a rolling ball will not maintain its motion indefinitely.
Euclid
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
The textbook solution for a pipe rolling down an incline is a = \frac{1}{2} g \sin \theta. Putting in theta = 0 gives a = 0. Does this imply that a ball rolling along a level surface will never stop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means that the object will not accelerate on a level plane if gravity is the only force.
 
Gravity is not the only force on an incline. Friction acts as well. And friction acts on a level plane too. So a rolling ball should come to a stop due to friction...
 
the textbook solution was for an "idealized model" with zero friction.
The MODEL has zero friction. Your fault if you try to apply this model
to situations where friction is NOT ignorable.

You're right, the model has a (hard) surface's Force as well as gravity's Force. And it suggests that the pipe rolling on a level floor will not slow down. Don't try this a home ; you'll soon over-reach this model when the pipe hits the kitchen table.
 
You said that this is the formula for a pipe rolling. If it was sliding, then friction would be a problem, but as it is rolling, friction shouldn't be the problem should it?
If I'm right, then the error would be due to some of the kinetic energy of motion being converted to heat, due to the particles of the pipe hitting against the particles in the surface when it is rolling, and drag.
So the textbook model was from an idealised model with friction, but with no energy loss as heat or drag.
 
There is also the fact that, it is not exactly one point that touches the ground during rolling motion as we assume in the ideal case. There will be an area which is in contact with the ground. Due to this the Normal force does not pass exactly through the center and hence there's a restoring torque which slows down the pipe.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top