Will Box Y Remain in Equilibrium?

AI Thread Summary
Box X is determined to be not in equilibrium due to the angle of the reaction force exceeding the angle of static friction. The analysis of Box Y is complicated by Box X's lack of equilibrium, preventing the calculation of the normal contact force. A different approach suggests that Box X can be in equilibrium if the moments are considered, yielding a reaction force of 71N, which is less than the maximum static friction. However, confusion arises regarding the convergence of forces at the center of mass. The discussion highlights the complexities of static equilibrium in systems involving multiple boxes and frictional forces.
aerograce
Messages
63
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A 8-kg homogeneous box X is resting against another 20-kg homogeneous box Y at
an angle such that its diagonal BC is horizontal as shown in Figure Q1. The angle
of static friction between box X and the floor is 45° and that between box Y and the
floor is 30°. Treat the contact surface between the two boxes as smooth. For
practical simplicity, use g = 10 m/s2.
Figure: View the attachment

(a) Determine whether box X is in equilibrium.
(3 marks)
(b) Determine whether box Y is in equilibrium with respect to sliding along the floor
and rotation about the corner A.
(4 marks)


Homework Equations


\mu=\frac{F}{N};
Tan\alpha=\mu




The Attempt at a Solution



Solving for Question b:
Identify that Box X is a three force body, and if it has to reach equilibrium state, the three forces have to pass through the center of mass. Draw a reaction force R(A) from the bottom of box X to its center of mass. Based on calculation, the angle formed by the R(A) with respect to the ground is 48.2°, which is more than the angle of static friction, and hence Box X is not equilibrium.

My problem is that, when I went to analyze Box Y, I cannot get sufficient values to analyse it as Box X is not at equilibrium and hence the normal contact force between them cannot be calculated.

Any thoughts? Thank you so much!
 

Attachments

  • QQ??20131102003936.png
    QQ??20131102003936.png
    37.1 KB · Views: 464
Physics news on Phys.org
hi aerograce! :smile:
aerograce said:
Based on calculation, the angle formed by the R(A) with respect to the ground is 48.2°, which is more than the angle of static friction, and hence Box X is not equilibrium.

isn't it the other way round? :confused:

if the angle from the ground was 90°, that would be ok wouldn't it? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi aerograce! :smile:


isn't it the other way round? :confused:

if the angle from the ground was 90°, that would be ok wouldn't it? :wink:

Hello! Could you attempt this problem? I recalculate my forces and found box X still not in equilibrium. The required minimum angle of friction is 53.2 degrees, which is more than angle of the static friction provided. Hence box X will not be in equilibrium.

My friend looks at this problem another way:
He takes moments of Box X about the point where it touches the ground, which gives him the reaction forces between two boxes. And this reaction force is 71N, which is less than the maximum static friction here(80N), hence it is in equilibrium. And my question is, if reaction force is 71N, the static friction force will be 71N as well. And the three forces will definitely not converge at one single point(according to geometry).

Sorry I am very confused now and I am looking for your help:) Thanks a million!
 
hello aerograce! :smile:
aerograce said:
My friend looks at this problem another way:
He takes moments of Box X about the point where it touches the ground, which gives him the reaction forces between two boxes. And this reaction force is 71N, which is less than the maximum static friction here(80N), hence it is in equilibrium. And my question is, if reaction force is 71N, the static friction force will be 71N as well. And the three forces will definitely not converge at one single point(according to geometry).

yes they do converge

the three forces are the horizontal reaction force at B, the weight, and the reaction force from the ground

the first two forces obviously go through the centre of mass

the third force (which is mg down and 71 N horizontally) also goes through the centre of mass :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top