Calculus Will this calculus book 'clear' me for mechanics textbooks?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of learning physics without a strong foundation in calculus. The participant has a background in high school algebra, trigonometry, and basic physics but feels inadequate due to limited calculus knowledge. They are currently studying "Calculus Early Transcendentals" by Stewart, which covers essential topics such as limits, differentiation, integration, and differential equations. The participant seeks advice on whether this preparation will enable them to tackle Taylor's "Classical Mechanics" effectively. Respondents suggest starting with a lower division mechanics book, like Kleppner, which focuses on Newtonian mechanics, before advancing to upper division topics like Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. The emphasis is on mastering foundational concepts before progressing to more complex physics.
Heatherfield
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I'm one of those people who's been trying to learn Physics for ages before finishing high school (writing it down like this really makes me sound like some hopeless nerd with nothing better to do..) but never got around to doing it because my calculus knowledge sucks so much. :-)

My knowledge of relevant topics is:
- high school algebra
- high school trig
- high school physics (that being mechanics and some SR all in one dimension)

To me, it seemed like the thing I lacked the most was a solid background in Calculus: our textbooks only cover the processes of differentiation and integration in very little detail. Thus, I started working myself through the seventh edition of Calculus Early Transcendentals by Stewart about a month ago. This textbook covers:
- Limits and Riemann sums
- Differentiation, integration and their applications in Maths
- Integration strategies
- Differential equations
- Polar coordinate systems
- Infinite series, including Taylor series
- Vectors and vector functions
- Partial derivatives and vector calculus

Combining these topics with my high school knowledge, will I be competent enough to get through a book such as Taylor's Classical Mechanics while being able to focus on the Physics instead of feeling mathematically incompetent? *also, if any of the topics above (the ones from the book) are useless to my pursuits, please tell. I'm pretty sure they're all essential (and interesting in their own way) but I'd rather get to the physics as soon as possible*

Kind regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I'm not mistaken, Taylor's classical mechanics is an upper division book. You should go through a lower division mechanics book like Kleppner first (which is not necessarily easier than Tayloer).
 
Thanks for the tip! Could you clarify 'division' just in case though?
 
Heatherfield said:
Thanks for the tip! Could you clarify 'division' just in case though?
Lower division mechanics is mostly Newtonian mechanics (Which Kleppner is meant for), while upper division mechanics is Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. Don't worry about what Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics is right now; just focus on Newtonian mechanics and calculus.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
27
Views
19K
Back
Top