Wind loading due to gusts; resultant torque on a 6' parabolic dish

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the wind loading effects on a two-axis 6-foot parabolic dish, particularly during gusts of up to 75 knots. A transient torque of 796 lb-ft for each axis was calculated based on these gust conditions, leading to a transient deflection of 0.0253 degrees. Additionally, torsional and bending errors due to wind loading were quantified, with azimuth and elevation errors calculated at 0.0044 degrees and 0.0107 degrees, respectively. The calculations assume a worst-case scenario for wind load and require specific modeling approaches to understand the torque values and associated pointing errors. For precise assumptions and methodologies, contacting the report's author is recommended.
mmh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

We had a company do a pointing error analysis on a proposed pedestal system, on which is mounted a two-axis (azimuth and elevation) 6 foot parabolic dish. I estimate the distance from the rotation axis to the apex of the dish to be roughly 43 inches. Among the error sources are errors due to wind loading. The following is an excerpt from the section about wind loading:

The wind loading was specified as 50 knot continuous with gust of 75 knots. For this analysis it was assumed that the worst-case gust would be from 0 to 75 knots. This gust differential resulted in a transient torque of 796 lb-ft for each axis. Knowing the drive compliance from testing of previous systems for this pedestal drive train, we are able to calculate the transient deflection of the axis due to wind load as 0.0253 degrees for each axis.

In addition to drive deflections due to wind loading, there is also structural deflections of the pedestal. These deflections include torsional error (azimuth axis), and bending error (elevation axis).

The error in the azimuth axis from torsional deflection from wind loading (75 knots resulting in 796 lb-ft of torque) is calculated to be 0.0044 degrees. The error in the elevation axis from bending deflection from wind loading (75 knots resulting in 927 lb-ft of torque) is calculated to be 0.0107 degrees.

The author said that "...the calculation was made assuming a worst-case gust was the delta force between a no wind load condition to a 75 knot wind load condition. Thus, the resultant load was that of a 75 knot wind on an 6-foot dish. We had to assume a distance from the rotating axis to the apex of the dish for this calculation."

I tried to figure out how the torque values were arrived at, and how the associated pointing errors were calculated, but had no luck. I tried modeling the wind gust as a force impinging on the apex of the dish, and then causing a torque on the center of rotation along the virtual lever arm defined by the center of rotation and the apex of the radar, but wasn't sure if that was the right approach. Does anyone have any idea how I might proceed?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
A 6 foot dish is probably modeled as a simple disk with an area of about 30 square feet.

The elevation error is the angular deflection of the dish mounting structure that results from the 75 mph wind pressure applied to the centre of a disk.

The azimuth error is probably calculated based on the 75 mph wind gust applied to one side of the disk only. That will result in an azimuth torque and an elevation bending of the structure. The vector sum is the pointing error.

If you need to know the precise assumptions made then you should contact the author of the report.
 
Great, thank you!
 
Nit pick: 75 mph ≠ 75 knots
 
SteamKing. That is knot nit picking. It is my carelessness while working in too many systems of units.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top