Which Operating System is Your Favorite?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around preferences between Mac, Windows, and Linux operating systems, with participants sharing their experiences and opinions. Some users express a strong preference for Macs, citing their ease of use and appealing hardware, while others defend Windows for its functionality and software availability. The conversation touches on misconceptions about Macs, such as their supposed lack of multi-button mice, and the challenges of switching operating systems, particularly from Windows to Mac. There are humorous exchanges about the necessity of right-clicking and playing games like Minesweeper, with some users noting the limited gaming options on Macs. Linux is mentioned as a viable alternative, but users express frustration with its compatibility and usability issues. Overall, the thread highlights the diverse opinions on operating systems, personal preferences shaped by experience, and the ongoing debate between the merits of each platform.

Which one

  • Windows, resistance is futile

    Votes: 15 46.9%
  • Mac, think different

    Votes: 3 9.4%
  • GNU/Linux, free as in freedom

    Votes: 13 40.6%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 3.1%

  • Total voters
    32
JamesU
Gold Member
Messages
821
Reaction score
3
which one do you like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not answering because there's no appropriate choice. I use a Mac because I'm smart enough to avoid Windows. :biggrin: (I'm not much into widows either. :-p) And you're just begging for Franz to come in and educate you on the joys of Linux! :rolleyes:
 
If I had the money I would try out a mac, but I am poor and am stuck with windows.
 
I still don't know how you can exist without right clicking
 
I use Windows, and I'm awesome. The two are unrelated, by the way.
I'm not too fond of widows, mind.[/size]

I use Windows because I couldn't afford a Mac. I use iApplications where possible (I love iTunes soo much). I'd like to have a Powerbook or something, but I'd be scared that people thought I was showing off (which is why I hide my iPod). I like Apple hardware.

On the other hand, I'm perfectly content with Windows, but that's probably because I spent hours after installation getting everything justright.


I can't believe I've entered into a "Windows vs Mac" thread.
 
Every time I use mac I end up getting confused because it's so unlike the precious windows
 
Yeah how do mac users right click? Is there such a thing as mouse gestures on a mac? How do I play minesweeper on a mac? Considering these are two of my computer necessities, I am not sure if I could switch even if I had the money.
 
Precious Windows? Who are you working for? I'm in shock.

precious Windows whatever...
 
and halo on a mac is only a 16 bit shooter game that's not haloesque!
 
  • #10
http://www.projectwasted.com/phpnuke/media/Commercials/MacSucks.wmv.jpg
http://www.glue.umd.edu/~sturdiva/unofficial/otherpics/Mac%20sucks/crazyapple.gif
http://www.glue.umd.edu/~sturdiva/unofficial/otherpics/Mac%20sucks/unhappymac.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
I thought you could get multiple buttoned Mac mouses?
 
  • #12
no, just one annoying button
 
  • #14
Not true. I have a trackball with 4 buttons that I can plug into my mac and use all 4 buttons plus the trackball.
 
  • #15
Ha! I have a mouse with 6 buttons and a wheel. pwned
 
  • #16
mattmns said:
Yeah how do mac users right click? Is there such a thing as mouse gestures on a mac? How do I play minesweeper on a mac? Considering these are two of my computer necessities, I am not sure if I could switch even if I had the money.
But Mac users get Widgets! :biggrin: (I have to get Tiger! *jumps up and down excitedly*)
 
  • #17
Smurf said:
Ha! I have a mouse with 6 buttons and a wheel. pwned
:frown: Now I'm jealous! I've never even seen a mouse with 6 buttons before. I want a 6 button mouse! :cry: I'll send my kitten out hunting for one. :biggrin:
 
  • #18
Moonbear said:
I have to get Tiger! *jumps up and down excitedly*

Someone's been playing under the power cables again...
 
  • #19
What's your computer useful for?
 
  • #20
Hmm I did a quick search and found mouse gestures for mac. For minesweeper I could always learn to not flag.
 
  • #21
mattmns said:
Hmm I did a quick search and found mouse gestures for mac.
Really? Cool. Which software uses those? I never really looked because it didn't sound like anything I'd likely use. I have enough trouble remembering the keyboard shortcuts I created for Word. :rolleyes:
For minesweeper I could always learn to not flag.
This is why mac users are so much more productive. No minesweeper to waste hours and hours playing (minesweeper was my addiction in the days before I had internet access; the withdrawal is rough when you first realize you don't have that or solitaire on your computer, but you do get over it.) :-p
 
  • #22
Frankly, I think that all computers are useful for is being useful. If you want to play minesweeper why not play soccer? If you want to waste time why not learn pine sculpture with chainsaws?

Why am I wasting my time?
 
  • #23
BicycleTree said:
If you want to play minesweeper why not play soccer?
Because I want to play minesweeper!

MB is right though, I would get used to it after a while.
 
  • #24
I only have three buttons and a scrollwheel. :frown:

edit: I prefer FreeBSD, I'm using Linux at the moment, and when I'm in school I like to play with the G5 PowerMacs. Soooooo fast... except when they crash (about once every 90 minutes of usage - what's up with that?). I also have Windows 2000 on my hard drive (for DVD watching), I don't go online with it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #25
I use Windows, I voted Mac, I hate Linux or any Unix for that matter.

*nix is the biggest waste of time for humanity in general. I want my wasted teenage years returned back to me when I wasted it on that piece of ****. And as far as Windows is concerned - I wish somebody would sue them everytime their computer crashed, but since this is a relatively new thing to actually have software on your computer, let alone a computer, people are just ready to have whatever they can get their hands on.

If you have a craving to waste your time on something, instead of playing with *nix, try QNX. At least you'll feel like a real man for once. Right.
 
  • #26
cronxeh, you are aware that OSX is based on Unix?

http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/unix/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #27
People swear by Linux so i might as well go with the crowd.

I use windows just because, as you pointed out, resistance is futile
 
  • #28
yes I'm well aware its based on Darwin/BSD. I was actually excited first time around I got my hands on OS X 9 something and went into console there (although they claim it was from Mac OS version 10)
 
Last edited:
  • #29
*nix is the biggest waste of time for humanity in general. I want my wasted teenage years returned back to me when I wasted it on that piece of ****. And as far as Windows is concerned - I wish somebody would sue them everytime their computer crashed, but since this is a relatively new thing to actually have software on your computer, let alone a computer, people are just ready to have whatever they can get their hands on.

If you have a craving to waste your time on something, instead of playing with *nix, try QNX. At least you'll feel like a real man for once. Right.

Who said anything about 'playing'? I use *nix on a PC because it's very functional - I have LaTeX and Perl and gcc, as well as the usual office apps (FREE), and a heck of a lot fewer bugs than Windows. Trying out RH, I didn't even have to install anything extra, other than Firefox.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #30
There is no doubt FreeBSD/OpenBSD/NetBSD (and not Linux) is great for most workstation and server applications - memory management, disk access, multiple CPU, etc, but for everyday browsing and mp3 listening its a waste of time. I have my server dusting up in the corner with FBSD 5.4 installed - but I have absolutely no use for any of the 'free' software - I already use OpenOffice for office suite, and there is no need for perl or gcc to be run on my poor laptop - I can always use my university's server which has Sun OS on it and compile anything I'd ever need without having to waste money on dual processors or memory

Oh and don't get me started with getting wine/winex to work properly to run Windows apps. Its like wow, over so many years you'd think the Linux community would get something to work properly and without a hickup. Nope. Never happened
 
Last edited:
  • #31
rachmaninoff said:
Who said anything about 'playing'? I use *nix on a PC because it's very functional - I have LaTeX and Perl and gcc, as well as the usual office apps (FREE), and a heck of a lot fewer bugs than Windows. Trying out RH, I didn't even have to install anything extra, other than Firefox.
I have a friend who uses Linux. He says that it takes forever to figure out how to run certain programs that aren't readily compatible. Ofcourse that may also be because he doesn't have it set up in the basic configuration (or what ever it's called).
Not to savy on computers myself but I would definitely like to learn more and one day run my computer on an OS other than windows.
 
  • #32
There is no doubt FreeBSD/OpenBSD/NetBSD (and not Linux) is great for most workstation and server applications - memory management, disk access, multiple CPU, etc, but for everyday browsing and mp3 listening its a waste of time.

Well that's *BSD was mostly intended for. I'm just saying it also works just fine for PC users - and I don't see anything wrong with the web browsing. I don't do any gaming, so it's practical.
 
  • #33
who changet the voting? it was upposed to be a joke :mad:
 
  • #34
TheStatutoryApe said:
I have a friend who uses Linux. He says that it takes forever to figure out how to run certain programs that aren't readily compatible. Ofcourse that may also be because he doesn't have it set up in the basic configuration (or what ever it's called).
Not to savy on computers myself but I would definitely like to learn more and one day run my computer on an OS other than windows.
I've never played with Linux. I'm going to have to get my paws on someone's computer with it just to see what it even looks/feels like. The transition from Windows to MacOS is pretty easy, and I used to use both regularly. Then again, I've been using both for ages. I actually had a harder time switching from OS 9.2 to OS X than I've had going between Mac and Windows. It took me a while to figure out where things were in OS X because they all had different names and very different places. But I haven't a clue what Linux even looks like let alone how easy it is to use.
 
  • #35
ive used a mac for years as my first computer. then i got a pc and it blew the mac out of the water. they both crashed about the same so macs arnt more stable imo. the main thing that sucks about macs though is the limited software. there are no good games on macs lol :(. and they still keep making them with 1 button mice. i couldn't live with less then 5 buttons on my mouse. i still have the old mac in my room and i think I am gona blow it up one day rofl
 
  • #36
yomamma said:
who changet the voting? it was upposed to be a joke :mad:

Who stole the cookie from the cookie jar? Not me. o:)
 
  • #37
I've never used Mac OS, but I like both Windows and Linux.
 
  • #38
For true multitasking capability, there's nothing to match OS/2 :biggrin:
 
  • #39
Gokul43201 said:
For true multitasking capability, there's nothing to match OS/2 :biggrin:
:smile: Gokul, do you know how to use OS/2? We have old equipment here that requires software that only runs on OS/2. Our only back-up is a second hard drive that our IT guy gets to babysit in his office to restore it in case of catastrophe. I've done my best to avoid needing to use the equipment in the hope that it'll crash and die before I need to learn OS/2.

Kakarot said:
ive used a mac for years as my first computer. then i got a pc and it blew the mac out of the water. they both crashed about the same so macs arnt more stable imo. the main thing that sucks about macs though is the limited software. there are no good games on macs lol :(. and they still keep making them with 1 button mice. i couldn't live with less then 5 buttons on my mouse. i still have the old mac in my room and i think I am gona blow it up one day rofl
If your experience on Macs was with an OS prior to OS X, I'd agree. I didn't have a very strong opinion of one over the other prior to OS X, and leaned toward PCs at the time just because the software selection for Macs was abysmal. And if you're into games, then PCs still offer the best selection for those, but I'm not buying a computer to play games, I'm buying it to do work. But, unless you need to run some custom business application, pretty much all the standard software you could want is available for Macs now; at least I haven't run into any problems finding the software I've needed.

I really don't know why they continue selling them with only one-button mice. They can support more buttons, and since this is such a silly gripe people have, they should just sell them with a two-button mouse; not that there's any shortage of mice you can buy separately that are pretty cheap, and most people I know who are picky about their mice want to buy their own one that's better than factory stock anyway.
 
  • #40
Well I usually use windows and linux x_x
 
  • #41
Smurf said:
Ha! I have a mouse with 6 buttons and a wheel. pwned
Is the wheel there so the mouse can run around it for exercise?
 
  • #42
Danger said:
Is the wheel there so the mouse can run around it for exercise?
:smile: Just in case you don't know what it is, he's talking about a scroll wheel. Instead of having to move the whole mouse to scroll down a page (and face the inevitable problem of running out of desktop before you've gotten to the bottom, and having to pick it up and move it up to continue scrolling down), you can just dial the wheel with your fingertip without moving the whole mouse. Even when I have them, I never remember to use them, so it's rather a non-issue for me. On that 4-button trackball I have, it's already 2 buttons more than I know what to do with. :smile: I rather miss the days when you just stuck the template at the top of your keyboard that told you what to use each of the function keys for in whatever software you were using and you didn't need a mouse at all. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: (Okay, maybe not. :biggrin:)[/size]
 
  • #43
How else do you move down a page besides the scroll wheel? highlight it or something?

and I have been puzzled a few times when I was doing something and my mouse was at the edge of the desk
 
  • #44
I can't live without scroll wheels.
 
  • #45
Moonbear said:
I've never played with Linux. I'm going to have to get my paws on someone's computer with it just to see what it even looks/feels like. The transition from Windows to MacOS is pretty easy, and I used to use both regularly. Then again, I've been using both for ages. I actually had a harder time switching from OS 9.2 to OS X than I've had going between Mac and Windows. It took me a while to figure out where things were in OS X because they all had different names and very different places. But I haven't a clue what Linux even looks like let alone how easy it is to use.
Generally people don't just use Linux. Most people have a windows emulator. But unless I'm mistaken the way Linux "looks" is pretty much the same as DOS unless you're using the windows emulator. You have a command prompt and type in your commands.
 
  • #46
Moonbear said:
:smile: Gokul, do you know how to use OS/2? We have old equipment here that requires software that only runs on OS/2. Our only back-up is a second hard drive that our IT guy gets to babysit in his office to restore it in case of catastrophe. I've done my best to avoid needing to use the equipment in the hope that it'll crash and die before I need to learn OS/2.
We run OS/2 on our data acquisition computers. I know just enough to get by. My boss just did a complete reinstall - there's a (German) website out there, where you can still find OS/2 kernels/updates/etc. I can find it if you like.
 
  • #47
TheStatutoryApe said:
Generally people don't just use Linux. Most people have a windows emulator. But unless I'm mistaken the way Linux "looks" is pretty much the same as DOS unless you're using the windows emulator. You have a command prompt and type in your commands.
People who use linux are not stuck with a command prompt. When I used linux I used gnome, which is a graphic interface, looks similar to windows.
 
  • #48
Gokul43201 said:
We run OS/2 on our data acquisition computers. I know just enough to get by. My boss just did a complete reinstall - there's a (German) website out there, where you can still find OS/2 kernels/updates/etc. I can find it if you like.
That's pretty much what our computer does...it tracks running wheel activity. But, no, I don't want to know anything about it. The only way it will ever get upgraded is when nobody knows how to use it or it breaks and nobody knows how to repair it. If I'm ever desperate, I'll give you a shout, but seeing as how I'm out of here in 2 months, I don't think that's going to happen. If I ever need to buy this stuff for my own lab, I'll have the new version.

yomamma said:
How else do you move down a page besides the scroll wheel? highlight it or something?

and I have been puzzled a few times when I was doing something and my mouse was at the edge of the desk

:smile: :smile: You just reminded me of a nearly computer illiterate lab tech I worked with once. She was entering data for something and started hollering she didn't know what to do now, she was highlighting something and kept running out of mouse pad! :smile:

Haven't you ever wondered what that nifty scroll bar is on the side of your screen? They work just fine, and if you park your mouse inside the bar, you can just click the button and page down, or use the arrows at the top or bottom of the scroll bar.
 
  • #49
mattmns said:
People who use linux are not stuck with a command prompt. When I used linux I used gnome, which is a graphic interface, looks similar to windows.
That's what I said isn't it? At least that's what I meant when I said windows emulator. :biggrin:
 
  • #50
Sorry I took windows emulator as in "wine," or "crossover office" -- programs that allow you to run windows software.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top