Wondering why my method of finding charge doesn't work?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum charge on a parallel plate capacitor with given capacitance and electric field limits. The correct method involves first determining the maximum voltage using the equation Vmax = Emax * d, resulting in 45V, and then calculating the charge with Qmax = C * Vmax, yielding 225pC. The user attempted a different approach using surface charge density (σ) but ended up with an incorrect charge value due to confusion over the area and units. Clarification is provided that σ should be related to area rather than length, which resolves the misunderstanding. The discussion highlights the importance of using appropriate equations and understanding the geometry of capacitors in calculations.
pradeepk
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A parallel plate capacitor has a capacitance of C=5.00pF when there is air between the plates. The separation between the plates is 1.50mm. What is the maximum magnitude of charge Q that can be placed on each plate if the electric field in the region between the plates is not to exceed 3.00 x 10^4 V/m?


Homework Equations


Equations my professor used:
Vmax=Emax*d
Qmax=CVmax

Equations I used:
E=σ/ε

The Attempt at a Solution


So the way my professor solved which is probably the easiest way and the right way is first he solved for the maximum potential:
Vmax=Emaxd
= (3.00 x 10^4 V/m)(1.50 x 10^-3m)= 45V
Then you can solve for the charge:
Qmax=CVmax
= (5pF)(45.0V)= 225pC

So the way I did it was that since we have parallel plates, we know the electric field between them is E=σ/ε. So:
3.00 x 10^4 V/m= σ/(8.85 x 10^-12 C^/Nm^2)
σ=2.655 x 10^-7

And since σ=Q/L
Q=σL
=(2.655 x 1-^-7)(1.50 x 10^-3 M)
=3.98 x 10^-10 C A different answer than my professor.

I know that my units are all messed up. But I just get confused because there are so many different ways to solve for the electric field..so shouldn't they all equal the same thing? Or is this different because it is a capacitor? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pradeepk said:
And since σ=Q/L
Q=σL
=(2.655 x 1-^-7)(1.50 x 10^-3 M)
=3.98 x 10^-10 C A different answer than my professor.
σ = Q/Area (not Q/L)

You need to make use of the given capacitance to find the charge.
 
ohhh ok I feel stupid now. So if we know the are then we could use this way. My professor however on a different problem used A=2∏r^2 for the area of the parallel capacitors. That doesn't really make sense to me since they are rectangles..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top