Work against an electric field due to a point charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the work done by an external agent to increase the radius of motion for a negatively charged particle in the electric field of a fixed positive charge. The initial approach incorrectly equates work with the change in electric potential, leading to confusion about the role of mass. The correct formula for work involves the electric field and the charge being moved, expressed as W = -∫(qE·dr). Participants clarify that work is done only when moving along a radial path and emphasize the importance of using the correct definitions. The conversation concludes with a sense of relief as the misunderstanding is addressed.
mhen333
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need help seeing if I did this right...

This is from Fundamentals of Physics, 8th edition, volume 2. By Jearl Walker.
Chapter 24, problem 88.

A particle of positive charge Q is fixed at point P. A second particle of mass m and negative charge -q moves at a constant speed in a circle of radius r_{1} centered at P. Derive an expression for the work W that must be done by an external agent on the second particle to increase the radius of the circle of motion to r_{2}.

Homework Equations


<br /> <br /> W_{\vec{E}} = -\int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{r}<br /> <br />
<br /> \vec{E} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{r}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I'm thinking. The work against the electric field is just the integral above. Since the particle stays on an equipotential surface, I should only have to worry about work outward, right?

Here's what I have:

<br /> <br /> W_{total} = W_{\vec{E}} = \left(\frac{1}{r_{2}} - \frac{1}{r_{1}}\right) \left(\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\right)<br /> <br />

Please help point out if I've done something wrong!-Mike
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your idea is correct, but your first equation is wrong. Usually gravity is ignored because the gravitational force is small compared to the electric force.
 
I think I figured out where I went wrong in my equation.

So I'm confused, where does the mass 'm' come in?
 
In brief, Work = Force times distance. So your equation for work should be

W_{\vec{E}} = -\int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} q \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{r}

Where the force is qE, q being the charge that's moved, and E is the field due to the charge Q.
 
Also, I should mention that you are correct. Work is done only when the charged is moved along a radial path.
 
Besides the approach that I mentioned in my previous post, you can also use the fact that Work = qV where q is the charge that's being moved, and V is the change in electric potential.

What you calculated in your work below, was the change in electric potential, not the work. All you have to do is change the "W" to "V" and multiply through by the charge q.

You were on the right track. Just forgot the definition, W = qV. So now you have two ways to look at it.

mhen333 said:



Homework Equations


<br /> <br /> W_{\vec{E}} = -\int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{r}<br /> <br />
<br /> \vec{E} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{r}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I'm thinking. The work against the electric field is just the integral above. Since the particle stays on an equipotential surface, I should only have to worry about work outward, right?

Here's what I have:

<br /> <br /> W_{total} = W_{\vec{E}} = \left(\frac{1}{r_{2}} - \frac{1}{r_{1}}\right) \left(\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\right)<br /> <br />

Please help point out if I've done something wrong!


-Mike
 
Thank you so much!

I've been nearly pulling my hair out over this.
 
Back
Top