Work and electric potential in a moving charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between electric potential and work when moving a positive charge in an electric field. Participants express confusion about whether to include kinetic energy in their explanations and how the nature of the charge affects the scenario. The importance of the electric field's direction and uniformity is highlighted, indicating that these factors significantly influence the work done. Additionally, a request for a definition of electric potential suggests that foundational knowledge is crucial for understanding the topic. Overall, clarity on these concepts is essential for accurately addressing the question posed.
Caterr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Explain briefly the relationship between electric potential and work in moving a positive charge q from point A to point B in an electric field

Should I explain that work is potential energy plus kinetic energy? is it asking for that?
and also, does the fact that it's a positive charge moving change anything? I'm confused
help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Caterr said:
1. Explain briefly the relationship between electric potential and work in moving a positive charge q from point A to point B in an electric field

Should I explain that work is potential energy plus kinetic energy? is it asking for that?
and also, does the fact that it's a positive charge moving change anything? I'm confused
help

Did this come with a diagram? The direction of the E-field from point A to point B makes a big difference. Is the E field assumed to be uniform?

Lots of info missing here unless you are supposed to go through all the general E-field orientations on your own.
 
I just had this exact same question on a physics test today. Word for word, and I've been looking for the answer. Any luck?
 
Caterr said:
1. Explain briefly the relationship between electric potential and work in moving a positive charge q from point A to point B in an electric field

Should I explain that work is potential energy plus kinetic energy? is it asking for that?
and also, does the fact that it's a positive charge moving change anything? I'm confused
help

You need to know the definition of electric potential .

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/182697/electric-potential

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top