Work done by electrostatic force

AI Thread Summary
A small, positively charged sphere moving away from a larger positively charged sphere experiences electrostatic force that is believed to do positive work, increasing its kinetic energy. The confusion arises when the answer indicates that the work done is negative, despite the kinetic energy increasing. The discussion suggests that the force indeed does positive work, and the discrepancy may be due to a typographical error in the provided answer. The conversation reflects a broader concern about the complexities and perceived inconsistencies in physics, likening it to algorithmic thinking. Ultimately, the consensus is that the initial understanding of positive work is correct and does not require reevaluation of fundamental concepts.
x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


A small, positively charged sphere is released from rest and moves directly away from a larger, positively charged sphere. During this process, the electrostatic force:

a) does positive work and increases the kinetic energy of the small sphere
b) does negative work and increases the kinetic energy of the small sphere

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

( + ) ----> (+)

So the electrostatic force is pushing the smaller charged force away. It looses potential energy and converts it into kinetic energy. Since W = (delta) (Kinetic energy) and kinetic energy increases, Ek > 0

Movement is also in the direction of the electric field (cos0) = 1 therefore it should be positive (as far as I know)

Work should be positive, the answer should be A)

However, the answer is B). Why?

It doesn't mathematically make sense to me. I've proven that W = change in kinetic energy.

However, when I conceptually think about it it makes sense that work is negative- because it's the same thing as a mass falling from a height- negative work is done on it.

Is this physics? Will it be full of exceptions and mathematical fallacies?

It seems like physics is turning more and more into a computer script

if case 1: do this algorithm
if case 2: do that algorithm

Is that it? Will I just have to just memorize these exceptions as I go along in physics, or is there another way of looking at it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
x86 said:

Homework Statement


A small, positively charged sphere is released from rest and moves directly away from a larger, positively charged sphere. During this process, the electrostatic force:

a) does positive work and increases the kinetic energy of the small sphere
b) does negative work and increases the kinetic energy of the small sphere

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

( + ) ----> (+)

So the electrostatic force is pushing the smaller charged force away. It looses potential energy and converts it into kinetic energy. Since W = (delta) (Kinetic energy) and kinetic energy increases, Ek > 0

Movement is also in the direction of the electric field (cos0) = 1 therefore it should be positive (as far as I know)

Work should be positive, the answer should be A)

However, the answer is B). Why?

It doesn't mathematically make sense to me. I've proven that W = change in kinetic energy.

However, when I conceptually think about it it makes sense that work is negative- because it's the same thing as a mass falling from a height- negative work is done on it.

Is this physics? Will it be full of exceptions and mathematical fallacies?

It seems like physics is turning more and more into a computer script

if case 1: do this algorithm
if case 2: do that algorithm

Is that it? Will I just have to just memorize these exceptions as I go along in physics, or is there another way of looking at it?

No, I think you have the right way of looking at it. The force does positive work on the kinetic energy of the system. I think it's more likely to be a typo in the answer than any need to reevaluate your basic concepts.
 
Dick said:
No, I think you have the right way of looking at it. The force does positive work on the kinetic energy of the system. I think it's more likely to be a typo in the answer than any need to reevaluate your basic concepts.

Thank you for clearing my confusion
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top