Work Done by Gravity on 265kg Load: 6.24x10^4 J

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work done by gravity on a 265-kg load lifted 24.0 m with an acceleration of 0.190 g. The initial calculation of the force of gravity was correct, yielding 2.6 x 10^3 N, and the work done was calculated as 6.24 x 10^4 J using the angle of 0°. However, the correct answer should reflect the opposite sign due to the angle being 180°, as gravity acts downward while the displacement is upward. This highlights the importance of considering the direction of forces in work calculations. Understanding the relationship between force direction and displacement is crucial for accurate physics problem-solving.
PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 265-kg load is lifted 24.0 m vertically with an acceleration =0.190 g by a single cable.

Determine the work done by gravity on the load.


Homework Equations



Force of Gravity = mg
W = F * d * cos (theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I know why I did this incorrectly but I want to make sure.

First attempt: Force gravity = (265 kg)(9.8 m/s^2) = 2.6 * 10^3 N.
W = (2.6 x 10^3 N) (24.0 m) * cos (0°)
W = 6.24 x 10^4 J.

The correct answer is the same magnitude but the opposite sign. Is that because the angle should have been 180° because gravity always points down? The displacement is up so therefore the angle between the net force and the displacement would have been 180°, not 0°?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PeachBanana said:

Homework Statement



A 265-kg load is lifted 24.0 m vertically with an acceleration =0.190 g by a single cable.

Determine the work done by gravity on the load.

Homework Equations



Force of Gravity = mg
W = F * d * cos (theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I know why I did this incorrectly but I want to make sure.

First attempt: Force gravity = (265 kg)(9.8 m/s^2) = 2.6 * 10^3 N.
W = (2.6 x 10^3 N) (24.0 m) * cos (0°)
W = 6.24 x 10^4 J.

The correct answer is the same magnitude but the opposite sign. Is that because the angle should have been 180° because gravity always points down? The displacement is up so therefore the angle between the net force and the displacement would have been 180°, not 0°?
That looks fine. What's your question?
 
I did it incorrectly the first time but I wanted to make sure I knew why it was wrong.
 
Yes, if your displacement is in the positive direction, then in this case gravity must be in the opposite direction (180 degrees from positive direction).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top