Work done by particle in a box in expanding the box?

fordhamdining
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm given that the energy of a particle in a rectangular box is the following:

E =\frac{\hbar \pi^2}{2m}(\frac{n_x^2}{L_x^2}+\frac{n_y^2}{L_y^2}+\frac{n_z^2}{L_z^2})

I'm to show that if the length of the box is increased adiabatically and quasistatically from L_x to 8L_x, the work done by the particle is 3/4 of the initial mean energy.

Homework Equations



The mean pressure exerted on the walls is
p=\frac{2E}{3V}
where V is the volume of the box. The force on the wall parallel to the x-axis is given by
\frac{-\partial E}{\partial L_x} = \hbar \pi^2n_x^2/mL_x^3[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried calculating the work by integrating pdV from 1 to 8 (since increasing one dimension by a factor of 8 increases the volume by the same) but I did not get the 3/4 I needed. There was a factor of ln(8) that could not possibly simplify to 3/4. Then I figured since the expansion is only happening in the x-direction, I can integrate F_xdL_x from 1 to 8 but I still didn't get the right answer. Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

If you are allowed to start with ##p = \frac{2E}{3V}##, then I think the result follows without needing the formula you gave in section 1 for the energy levels of a particle in a box.

The wording of the question is a little unclear to me. Are you meant to assume that the particle starts out in a definite energy eigenstate corresponding to some particular (but unspecified) values of ## n_x, n_y## and ##n_z##? If so, then I don't understand the phrase "3/4 of the initial mean energy". If the particle is initially in a specific energy eigenstate, then it seems to me that there is no need to use the word "mean" here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top