Work Done by Skier on Ski Slope: Calculate & Find Speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phykid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work done
AI Thread Summary
The skier, with a mass of 70 kg, ascends a slope 20 m high, resulting in a work done against gravity calculated as 1400 J (Work Done = F x D). The confusion arises regarding whether to multiply this work by the gravitational force (10 N/kg) for further calculations. For the next part, the potential energy change (PE = mgh) should equal the kinetic energy (KE = 1/2 mv^2) to find the skier's speed at the bottom. The skier's weight is crucial in determining the forces involved, but the initial work done does not need to be multiplied by gravity again. The calculations should focus on the relationship between potential and kinetic energy without additional multiplication by gravity.
Phykid
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A skier with a mass of 70kg rides a chairlift to a point of 20m higher up a ski slope.
She then Skis back down to the bottom of the chairlift.

Calculate the work done against gravity by the chairlift in carrying the skier up the slope
(Assume that g=10n/kg)

Homework Equations


Work Done = F x D


The Attempt at a Solution


Work done = 70 x 20
= 1400

*This is the part where I am confused.*

When we started out doing Work done, we never involved work done against another force. So Would I multiply the Work Done (1400) by 10 (kg, Gravity)?

Thanks,
Phykid

Edit - The following question: "Find the skier's speed when she reaches the bottom of the chairlift.
Ignore the effects of friction and air resistance and assume that g=10n/kg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Rememebr the force is the weight of the skier in Newtons, F = m g

To get the speed simply assume that potential energy change PE = m g h
equals the kinetic energy KE = 1/2 m v^2
 
So if I am working it out against gravity, would I multiply the 14000 by 10 (gravity)?

Thanks.
Phykid
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top