"Work done by the electric field"

AI Thread Summary
The term "work done by the electric field" refers to the integral of force over distance, represented as ∫F.dL, which some argue should instead be termed "work done by the electric force." The discussion highlights the ambiguity in terminology, suggesting that language evolves based on tradition rather than strict logic. Participants acknowledge that while the terminology may frustrate some, it is widely accepted in physics. The work done is influenced by the sign of the test charge and the direction of the electric field, which affects the force's direction. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the concepts rather than getting caught up in the terminology.
davidbenari
Messages
466
Reaction score
18
Why is ∫F.dL called the work done by the electric field? This makes absolutely no sense in my opinion, and I think it should be called the work done by the electric force.

∫E.dL should be called the work done by the electric field. Even if that's not rigorously "work".

Can anyone prove me wrong so that I stop feeling pissed off when I do problems?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its english. English, like all natural language, arises organically and is not subject to strict rules of delineation and logic. That is one reason math was invented in the first place.

Might as well get all pissed that you drive on the parkway and park on the driveway.
 
davidbenari said:
Can anyone prove me wrong so that I stop feeling pissed off when I do problems?

No.

But much of natural language is <understatement>less than completely precise</understatement> and the terminology has evolved over time and is driven by tradition as much as logic... So it is the way it is. The only person who gains when you get pissed off is your cardiologist.
 
Lol. I laughed at that cardiologist thing. So just to be sure, whenever they say work done by the electric field they really just mean the work done by the electric force right? Like, it will depend on the sign the test charge has right?
 
davidbenari said:
Lol. I laughed at that cardiologist thing. So just to be sure, whenever they say work done by the electric field they really just mean the work done by the electric force right? Like, it will depend on the sign the test charge has right?

Yes. The sign of the test charge and the direction of the field determine the direction of the force, so if you change one but not the other you change the direction of the force.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top