How Is Work Calculated in Elliptical Orbits?

AI Thread Summary
Work in elliptical orbits is determined by the dot product of the force and displacement vectors, with the understanding that only motion in the same direction as the force does work. In circular orbits, there is zero acceleration and constant speed, while in elliptical orbits, the body accelerates or decelerates based on its position relative to the gravitational source. The discussion highlights confusion around the application of force components and the angles involved. It clarifies that work is done when there is motion parallel to the force, while perpendicular forces do not contribute to work. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately calculating work in elliptical orbits.
CaptainADHD
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/7206/wtffffftv0.th.jpg http://g.imageshack.us/thpix.php

Homework Equations



Work is the dot product of force vector and displacement vector. Centripetal acceleration is velocity squared divided by radius -- multiply by mass to get force.

The Attempt at a Solution



Parallel does no work, perpendicular speeds it up ----->>> which is wrong (failed this question).

I understand that objects in circular orbit have zero acceleration and thus constant speed. But with elliptical orbits, the body is speeding up or slowing down depending on its position relative to the body exerting gravitational force upon it.

What exactly is parallel to the planet itself? I'm having a hard time understanding how to apply force components when I don't know what the angles are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I'm following this correctly, it will be the reverse answer of what you gave. Work is done only if there is some motion in the same direction of the force. By parallel, they mean parallel to the movement of the planet, or in the same direction as the V arrow. Perpendicular is perpendicular to the motion, or the force that tries to smash the planet into the sun. It doesn't move that way, so no work by perpendicular, and parallel speeds it up.
 
krausr79 said:
If I'm following this correctly, it will be the reverse answer of what you gave. Work is done only if there is some motion in the same direction of the force. By parallel, they mean parallel to the movement of the planet, or in the same direction as the V arrow. Perpendicular is perpendicular to the motion, or the force that tries to smash the planet into the sun. It doesn't move that way, so no work by perpendicular, and parallel speeds it up.

Thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top