Work Done on N2 Gas in Isothermal Expansion: Irreversible vs Reversible

  • Thread starter Thread starter madtaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
AI Thread Summary
In the isothermal expansion of 2 liters of N2 gas from 5 atm to 1 atm at 273K, the work done on the gas was calculated under both irreversible and reversible conditions. For the irreversible process, the work done was found to be -4040 J, while for the reversible process, it was -1625 J. The calculations indicate that the work done in the irreversible expansion is greater in magnitude compared to the reversible case, which contradicts the expectation that reversible processes yield maximum work. The discrepancy arises from the use of external pressure in the irreversible calculation, which does not account for the internal pressure changes during expansion. Clarification on the assumptions and calculations is needed to resolve this confusion.
madtaz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
2 litres of N2 held in a piston at a pressure of 5 atm initially held at
T=273K expands isothermally until the final pressure is 1 atm. What is
the work done on the gas in this expansion under (i) irreversible and (ii)
reversible conditions? Comment on the magnitude of your answers to
(i) and (ii). (You may assume that N2 behaves as an ideal gas.)

My attempt:

for irreversible we have : w' = p(ext) (Vf -Vi)

I've taken p(external) to be 5 atm = 5.05x10^5 Pa

V (initial) is 2 litres = 0.002 m^3

to find Vfinal i used V = P x V (initial)/ P final

to get V final = 0.01

Putting these numbers into w' = p(ext) (Vf -Vi) to get 4040 J, but for the work done on the system this is -4040j

For reversible is used w' = nRT ln (Vf / Vi) to get 1625 J, so for work done on the system = -1625 J

But the Reversible process should be higher as maximum work occurs so the value for the irreversible should be lower.

Where have I gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any ideas?
 
has anyone had a go at this?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top