Work done shortening string of rotating object

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done to shorten the distance from a vertical tube to a rotating 10kg mass attached to a string. Key points include the consideration of angular momentum and the absence of torque since the string remains in a radial direction. Participants emphasize the need to analyze the relationship between linear and angular velocities, as well as the position vector relative to the origin. The problem can be approached without knowing the rate of pull on the string, focusing instead on the initial and final radii. The original poster has not yet responded, indicating they may have resolved the issue independently.
WestCoast
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



10kg is attached to the end of a string, which is thread through a vertical tube. The string and the tube always make a 90 degree angle. The distance from the tube to the mass is R and the velocity at which it rotates is V. How much work is done to shorten the distance from the tube to the mass to x?

__distance X________10kg
[l] string
[l]
[l] t
[l] u
[l] b
[l] e
[l]
.l
.l string





Homework Equations



work = torque * theta = r*F*sin(theta)



The Attempt at a Solution



string radius being shortened from X to x, so the displacement is (X-x)
does the velocity change?



 
Physics news on Phys.org
WestCoast said:
work = torque * theta = r*F*sin(theta)
That is not a good approach. There is no torque - the string is always in radial direction.

does the velocity change?
Think about angular momentum.
 
The problem statement should mention that the 10kg mass is sliding on a frictionless surface and that there are no other losses of energy such as aerodynamic drag.

mfb said:
That is not a good approach. There is no torque - the string is always in radial direction.
Depends on how "radial" is defined in this case. During the time when the mass is pulled in by the string, it's path is not circular, and the direction of the string is not perpendicular to the momentary velocity of the mass.

mfb said:
Think about angular momentum
This is a good hint.
 
rcgldr said:
Depends on how "radial" is defined in this case.
With the obvious polar coordinate system.
and the direction of the string is not perpendicular to the momentary velocity of the mass.
That does not change the fact that we have zero torque.
 
mfb said:
The string is always in radial direction.
rcgldr said:
Depends on how "radial" is defined in this case.
mfb said:
With the obvious polar coordinate system.
The alternative would be the direction of the radius of curvature, which would always be perpendicular to the velocity of the mass. I'll wait to see if the original poster follows up on this thread.
 
we know angular momentum = (position vector relative to origin) x (linear momentum)
- linear momentum = 10kgV
-what is the position vector relative to origin?
-what angle does the position vector make with the linear momentum.
-- if < 180 angular momentum = 0.
 
WestCoast said:
we know angular momentum = (position vector relative to origin) x (linear momentum)
- linear momentum = 10kgV
-what is the position vector relative to origin?
-what angle does the position vector make with the linear momentum.
-- if < 180 angular momentum = 0.
To evaluate the product, is sufficient to know the angle between string and velocity. You can assume that the mass makes a nearly perfect circle around the end of the tube.
 
WestCoast said:
what angle does the position vector make with the linear momentum?
The angle is unknown, since the rate of pull on the string is unknown. The problem can be solved in terms of the initial radius R, and the final radius x, without knowing the rate at which this transition occurred. The angular momentum in this case would be:

ω = angular velocity
m = mass
r = radius
I = angular inertia = m r^2 (for a point mass moving in a circle)
v = linear velocity = ω r

angular momentum = ω I = ω m r^2 = v m r

The original poster hasn't replied to this thread, so he may have already solved it.
 
Back
Top