Work & Energy: Definition and History

AI Thread Summary
The term "work" in physics was defined by Gaspard-Gustave de Coriolis in the 1820s, emphasizing its importance in understanding physical phenomena. The definition of work is crucial for analyzing energy transfer and mechanical systems, making it easier to comprehend natural processes. The work-energy theorem and the principle of conservation of energy emerged as foundational concepts in physics, allowing for deeper insights into mechanical interactions. Historical approaches to these concepts have evolved, reflecting advancements in scientific understanding. Overall, the definition of work serves as a key framework for studying energy dynamics in various physical contexts.
muzz
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
why work is defined? and when it was defined ( approximately) and who has defined it? It is one of the most important things in physics and I am wondering that is it defined only for make the seeing and understanding things in the nature easier?

Actually I am also wondering about when and how did people approach mechanical or any physical things through conservation of energy or work-energy theorem.

Everybody knows;such as, F=ma or orher laws details, but I ve never heard any historical things about energy, work, conservation, etc.

Thank you all in advance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The term "work" was apparently coined by Coriolis in the 1820s.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Why does the main muscle use the most energy in body movements?
Replies
24
Views
2K
Is conservation of energy derived from the work energy theorem?
2
Replies
65
Views
5K
B The work done by two objects on each other
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
Gravitational potential energy -- Why is it always negative?
Replies
10
Views
3K
Definition of potential energy
Replies
13
Views
1K
Regarding the idea of potential energy
Replies
2
Views
1K
Conservative forces, Nonconservative forces and Potential Energy
Replies
9
Views
3K
Can we say that work done can be used only for mechanical energy?
Replies
14
Views
1K
I Work Done/Energy Transferred in One Dimensional Collision
Replies
5
Views
2K
Work Done: Understanding the Definition and Maths
Replies
19
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top