Work equation for electrostatics and electricity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion between two equations for work in electrostatics: W=qV and W=-PE. A parallel plate capacitor problem is presented where a +3 charge is moved from the negative to the positive plate of a 10 V battery, yielding different results using both equations. The key point is understanding who is doing the work; if the external force moves the charge in the same direction as the electric field, it is considered positive work. The ambiguity in the problem's wording leads to different interpretations of whether the work done is by the system or by the external force. Clarifying this distinction is crucial for determining the correct application of the work equations.
Benny851
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have a question about the equation for work as it pertains to electrostatics and electricity. One book I read says equation for work done by electric field is W=qV, but another book says W=-PE. However, when I try both equations for the following problem I get different answer. Could someone please explain to me which equation I should use and why? Thanks.

Parallel plate capacitor with 10 V battery. +3 charge is on negative plate and you need to move it to positive plate. calculate work.

w=-pe -> -(3*10) = -30

w=qv -> 3*10= 30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Benny851 said:
I have a question about the equation for work as it pertains to electrostatics and electricity. One book I read says equation for work done by electric field is W=qV, but another book says W=-PE. However, when I try both equations for the following problem I get different answer. Could someone please explain to me which equation I should use and why? Thanks.

Parallel plate capacitor with 10 V battery. +3 charge is on negative plate and you need to move it to positive plate. calculate work.

w=-pe -> -(3*10) = -30

w=qv -> 3*10= 30

Something I like to do is to put myself into the problem.

Imagine for a moment that you are able to shrink yourself down to the size of the charge and physically push it. If the force that you apply on the charge is in the same direction as the charge's displacement, then it can be said that "you have done positive work on the system."

On the other hand, if you are pushing the charge forward, but the charge ends up going backward such that the force that you exert is in the opposite direction as the charge's displacement, then it can be said that "you have done negative work on the system." This is equivalent to saying "the system has done positive work on you."

So the correct answer involves who is doing work on what.

In this problem there are two forces involved: the force that you exert on the system and the equal and opposite force that the system exerts on you (or exerts on the charge if you were not there to keep it from accelerating).

Assuming a constant force, one can define the work as
W = \vec F \cdot \vec{\Delta x}
If \vec F and \vec{\Delta x} are in the same direction the work is positive, if they are in opposite directions, the work is negative. Of course the answer depends on which force you are talking about!

So let's revisit this problem as it was worded:

Parallel plate capacitor with 10 V battery. +3 charge is on negative plate and you need to move it to positive plate. calculate work.

The question, as it was worded, is sort of ambiguous. It's not clear if its talking about the work done by the system or the work done by you. But if I had to guess, I would say it wants you give the work done by you, on the system, when you move the charge from the negative plate to the positive plate.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top