Work of Varying X Component by Integration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a 76-kg crate moving from point A to B using integration, with a constant force of 756 N and varying angle θ. The user initially struggles with integrating the variable component of force, particularly in expressing cos θ in terms of displacement. After some back-and-forth, it is clarified that the limits of integration should be from 0 m to 5 m, and the user realizes a mistake in their approach to simplifying the integral. The conversation highlights the need for proper integration techniques, including potential trigonometric substitution, to solve the problem correctly. Ultimately, the user is encouraged to find the antiderivative of a specific function to proceed with the integration.
Ad Astra
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 76-kg crate starts from rest at A and is moving at 8 m/s. Using integration, find the work done between A and B of the variable x component of force F= 756 N. (See attached jpeg for the geometry of the problem)

EDIT: We are doing a variation of the problem shown in the jpeg below, the only difference being the length from A to B (5 m instead of 6 m) and the vertical position of the pulley (5 m instead of 6 m).



Homework Equations


U1-2= ∫F cos θ dx


The Attempt at a Solution


Since F is constant and cos θ is variable, I've tried to relate cos θ in terms of the displacement in x. Since cos θ = Δx/Δ(Length of rope), and because the vertical displacement of the pulley remains constant (5 m), I obtained a value of:

cos θ = x/(x2 + 25)-1/2

Whenever I solve this integral I end up with a value equal to the magnitude of the force multiplied by a displacement of 7.5 m in x which, from the geometry of the problem, is impossible. Obviously, I'm just not looking at this correctly. Any hints would be very helpful, and thank you in advance.
 

Attachments

  • HW10.jpg
    HW10.jpg
    5.9 KB · Views: 399
Physics news on Phys.org
Ad Astra said:
Since F is constant and cos θ is variable, I've tried to relate cos θ in terms of the displacement in x. Since cos θ = Δx/Δ(Length of rope), and because the vertical displacement of the pulley remains constant (5 m), I obtained a value of:

cos θ = x/(x2 + 25)-1/2
Looks good. (Except for the minus sign in front of the 1/2. I assume that was a typo.)
Whenever I solve this integral I end up with a value equal to the magnitude of the force multiplied by a displacement of 7.5 m in x which, from the geometry of the problem, is impossible.
What did you get when you integrated? What were your limits of integration?
 
0m5m (F cos θ) dx

= F∫0m5m (cos θ) dx

= F∫0m5m [x(x2 + 25)-1/2] dx

= F∫0m5m [1 + (x/5)] dx

= F{∫0m5m dx + 1/5∫0m5m x dx}

= F{[x + x2/10]5m0m}

= F{[(5 m) + (5 m)2/10] - [0]}

= F(7.5 m), where F= 756 N

= 5670 J

This just seems to be too high a value to me. Since the x component of F is always decreasing and can never be more than F itself and, furthermore, is not applied for a displacement greater than 5 m, I feel this value should be lower than this. Maybe I'm wrong, but I can't figure out where it is exactly that I'm going wrong.

Sorry if my notation seems a little sloppy, I've never tried to express an integral via digital media before. I hope it makes sense.
 
Ad Astra said:
0m5m (F cos θ) dx

= F∫0m5m (cos θ) dx

= F∫0m5m [x(x2 + 25)-1/2] dx
OK. Are the limits 0 to 5 or 2 to 7?

= F∫0m5m [1 + (x/5)] dx
:confused: How did you get this?
 
Doc Al said:
OK. Are the limits 0 to 5 or 2 to 7?


:confused: How did you get this?

I wish there was an emoticon for an embarrassed slap to one's own forehead. I can't believe I made such an amateurish move. I guess I somehow convinced myself that (a + b)x was equal to ax + bx and then multiplied both terms by x. I was just trying to simplify my integral before trying to integrate.

Now I feel better for knowing where I was going wrong, but am left with the task of integrating the square root of a sum of squares. I don't even know where to begin on that one. Maybe some sort of trig substitution?

My teacher said that it was fairly simple integral and now I feel like a moron for not being able to grasp it. I feel like the answer is right there in front of me and I'm just not seeing it...:confused:

EDIT: The upper limits are from A to B (in the picture I provided), or from 0m to 5 m so far as I can tell.
 
Ad Astra said:
Now I feel better for knowing where I was going wrong, but am left with the task of integrating the square root of a sum of squares. I don't even know where to begin on that one. Maybe some sort of trig substitution?
Nah, nothing that complicated.

You need to find the antiderivative of \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2 + a^2}}

Play around with it a bit. (Or just look it up!)
EDIT: The upper limits are from A to B (in the picture I provided), or from 0m to 5 m so far as I can tell.
In your diagram, B is not directly under C.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top