Work Question - Is something missing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sabellic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done in accelerating a 2.0 kg object from 2.0 m/s to 3.0 m/s, the necessary information includes mass, initial velocity, and final velocity. While the initial equation provided was correct, it lacked the necessary relation involving kinetic energy. The correct approach is to use the change in kinetic energy formula, which is (1/2) m (vf^2 - vi^2). This leads to the conclusion that the work done is 5 Joules. Understanding this relation simplifies the calculation and avoids unnecessary derivations in future problems.
Sabellic
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the work done accelerating a 2.0 kg object from 2.0 m/s to 3.0 m/s.

mass=2.0 kg
Initial Velocity= 2.0 m/s
Final Velocity= 3.0 m/s


Homework Equations


Work=applied force x displacement



The Attempt at a Solution


Correct me, if I am wrong, but don't I need a bit more information to answer this question? This was all the information given to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Sabellic,

Sabellic said:

Homework Statement


Calculate the work done accelerating a 2.0 kg object from 2.0 m/s to 3.0 m/s.

mass=2.0 kg
Initial Velocity= 2.0 m/s
Final Velocity= 3.0 m/s


Homework Equations


Work=applied force x displacement



The Attempt at a Solution


Correct me, if I am wrong, but don't I need a bit more information to answer this question? This was all the information given to me.

No, that's all you need. The equation you listed is true; however, there is another equation that involves work and velocity. What is it?
 
Hmmmm. I don't know. The only thing that I can conjure up is that the work can be equivalent to (mass/acceleration) * (final velocity^2 - initial velocity^2)/2 * a^2

But that doesn't work because i don't have the acceleration.
 
Sabellic said:
Hmmmm. I don't know. The only thing that I can conjure up is that the work can be equivalent to (mass/acceleration) * (final velocity^2 - initial velocity^2)/2 * a^2

But that doesn't work because i don't have the acceleration.

That's so close! But it needs to be:

(mass/acceleration) * (final velocity^2 - initial velocity^2)/2 * a

and so the accelerations will cancel.

Then notice that what you have left is:

(1/2) m vf^2 - (1/2) m vi^2

Does that look more familiar? What are those terms? Once you have that, you will have the important equation that you need to know.
 
Oh God you're right. I wrote (mass/acceleration) instead of mass * acceleration. So yes, they would cancel out. Thanks a lot for this. So it will be 5 Joules, I think.
 
That's good, but you don't want to have to derive that important formula every time. The way to think about it is

total work = change in kinetic energy

(where total work includes all conservative and non-conservative work).

Since kinetic energy is (1/2) m v^2, you could write down the relation you need right away.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top