Work required to move a charged ball

  • Thread starter Thread starter Black Armadillo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Charged Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to move a charged ball (3.40 μC) to the center of a charged ring (5.00 μC) with a diameter of 7.10 cm. The potential energy change is calculated using the formula W = -ΔU, where U is derived from the electric field E at the center of the ring. The participants clarify the integration process for determining the electric field and potential energy, concluding that the work done can be expressed as W = Vq, where V is the electric potential at the center of the ring.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential energy and work-energy principles
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and electric fields
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in physics
  • Basic concepts of charge distribution and potential in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential from electric fields in electrostatics
  • Learn about the application of integration in calculating electric fields for continuous charge distributions
  • Explore the relationship between electric potential energy and work done in electrostatic systems
  • Investigate the effects of gravitational fields on charged particles in electrostatic contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving electrostatic problems related to charged particles and fields.

Black Armadillo
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ring of diameter 7.10 cm is fixed in place and carries a charge of 5.00 μC uniformly spread over its circumference. How much work does it take to move a tiny 3.40 μC charged ball of mass 1.70 g from very far away to the center of the ring?

Homework Equations


I tried using: W=-\Delta U

The Attempt at a Solution


We know that when the ball is very far away U=0J

Then to find the potential energy when the ball is in the center of the ring I did:
Change in charge is 5.00X10^{-9}C/2\pi(0.0710m)=1.12X10^{-8}C/m

\int \frac{k*q*dq}{r} ds from 0 to 2pi.

\frac{k*q*dq}{r} \int ds from 0 to 2pi.

\frac{8.988X10^{9}N*m^2/C^2*3.40X10^{-9}C*1.12*10^{-8}C/m}{0.0710m} \int ds from 0 to 2pi =3.031X10^-5J.

W=-\Delta U=-(3.031X10^-5J-0J)=-3.031X10^-5J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm having trouble following your integral from the first line. I'm thinking V = kq/r for a point charge so dV = k/r*dq, where r is the radius of the ring.
Ah, you are doing energy E = QV so dE = QdV = kQ/r*dq
I'm using q for the charge on the ring, Q for the charge on the particle.
Your s must be something to do with the arc length going round the ring.
So dq = q/(2*pi*r)*ds
Using s = r*A where A is the angle running from 0 to 2pi, you get ds = r*dA and
dq = q/(2*pi)dA
so the integral is dE = kQq/(2*pi*r)*dA from A = 0 to 2*pi.
The nice thing about this integral is that nothing depends on the angle so
integral 0 to 2*pi of dA is just 2*pi.
E = kQq/r.
Well, I guess we didn't need to integrate at all! Because all the charge is the same distance from the center point.
 
I'm still slightly confused. So I can find E at the center of the ring using E=kQq/r. But, since W=-(U_f-U_i) how do I get U from E? Since E=kq/r^2 and U=kq_1*q_2/r would you just multiply the E you get by qr and if so what q would you use: the charge on the ring or the charge on the ball? Thanks for your help.
 
Try this approach. Find E as a function of r along the axis of the ring using integration. Then

V=-\int_{\infty}^{r}\mbox{Edr}

The work done is

W=Vq

Is the mass in a gravitational field also and if so what is the orientation of the ring axis with the field?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
24K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K