Working Backwards from the GCD: Finding the Solution to a GCD Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a solution to a GCD calculation, specifically for the numbers 621 and 483. The original poster attempts to work backwards from the calculated GCD of 69 using the Euclidean algorithm.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to express the original numbers in terms of the GCD. Some suggest using the relationships established by the Euclidean algorithm to work backwards, while others express confusion regarding the notation used in the mathematical expressions.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of how to derive the original numbers from the GCD. Some participants provide guidance on manipulating the equations, while others seek clarification on the notation and steps presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note challenges with understanding the LaTeX formatting used in some posts, which may hinder the clarity of the discussion. The original poster mentions being instructed to work backwards from the GCD, indicating a specific method they are trying to follow.

Math100
Messages
823
Reaction score
234
Homework Statement
Find a solution of 621m+483n=k, where k is the gcd of 621 and 483.
Relevant Equations
None.
First, we start to calculate the gcd(621, 483).
Applying the Euclidean algorithm produces:
621=1*483+138
483=3*138+69
138=2*69.
Thus gcd(621, 483)=69.

And now I'm stuck, because I don't know how to find the solution of this after finding out the gcd of 621 and 483. I was told to work/calculate backwards starting from 69, for example, like this:

69=483-(3*138)
?=?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start at the end:
\begin{align*}
138=2\cdot 69 & \Longrightarrow 483=3\cdot 138+69 =3\cdot(2\cdot 69)+69=7\cdot 69 \\
483=7\cdot 69 & \Longrightarrow 621=1\cdot 483 +138 = \ldots
\end{align*}
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
fresh_42 said:
Start at the end:
$$
138=2\cdot 69 \Longrightarrow 483=3\cdot 138+69 =3\cdot(2\cdot 69)+69=7\cdot 69
483=7\cdot 69 \Longrightarrow 621=1\cdot 483 +138 = \ldots
$$
Sorry, I don't understand this, as this was written in latex.
 
Math100 said:
Sorry, I don't understand this, as this was written in latex.
Now it renders. Refresh the page (F5).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
At the end, you can use ##4\cdot 7 - 3\cdot 9 =1## and multiply it with ##69.##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100 and hutchphd
Thank you for the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K