Working Backwards from the GCD: Finding the Solution to a GCD Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the greatest common divisor (GCD) of 621 and 483 using the Euclidean algorithm, resulting in a GCD of 69. Participants explore the process of working backwards from this GCD to express the original numbers in terms of 69. The discussion highlights the steps involved in manipulating equations derived from the Euclidean algorithm, ultimately leading to a linear combination that confirms the GCD. The use of LaTeX for mathematical expressions is noted, which aids in clarity but may confuse some users.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Euclidean algorithm for GCD calculation
  • Familiarity with linear combinations in number theory
  • Basic knowledge of LaTeX for mathematical notation
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Euclidean algorithm in depth to understand its applications
  • Learn how to express numbers as linear combinations of their GCD
  • Explore advanced number theory concepts such as the Extended Euclidean Algorithm
  • Practice using LaTeX for formatting mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, educators teaching GCD concepts, and anyone interested in algorithmic problem-solving techniques.

Math100
Messages
817
Reaction score
230
Homework Statement
Find a solution of 621m+483n=k, where k is the gcd of 621 and 483.
Relevant Equations
None.
First, we start to calculate the gcd(621, 483).
Applying the Euclidean algorithm produces:
621=1*483+138
483=3*138+69
138=2*69.
Thus gcd(621, 483)=69.

And now I'm stuck, because I don't know how to find the solution of this after finding out the gcd of 621 and 483. I was told to work/calculate backwards starting from 69, for example, like this:

69=483-(3*138)
?=?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start at the end:
\begin{align*}
138=2\cdot 69 & \Longrightarrow 483=3\cdot 138+69 =3\cdot(2\cdot 69)+69=7\cdot 69 \\
483=7\cdot 69 & \Longrightarrow 621=1\cdot 483 +138 = \ldots
\end{align*}
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
fresh_42 said:
Start at the end:
$$
138=2\cdot 69 \Longrightarrow 483=3\cdot 138+69 =3\cdot(2\cdot 69)+69=7\cdot 69
483=7\cdot 69 \Longrightarrow 621=1\cdot 483 +138 = \ldots
$$
Sorry, I don't understand this, as this was written in latex.
 
Math100 said:
Sorry, I don't understand this, as this was written in latex.
Now it renders. Refresh the page (F5).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
At the end, you can use ##4\cdot 7 - 3\cdot 9 =1## and multiply it with ##69.##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100 and hutchphd
Thank you for the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K