Which countries have the highest quality military equipment?

  • News
  • Thread starter JPC
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Quality
In summary, the conversation is about the best military equipment and capabilities in the world, including fighters, tanks, attack subs, nuclear submarines, and anti-air systems. The person expressing their interest in military matters believes that the US and UK have superior military abilities compared to other countries like North Korea, China, and India, despite their larger numbers. They are more interested in the quality rather than the quantity of military strength.
  • #1
JPC
206
1
hey was wondering

Which are the best Fighters in the world ? An american F type, a Dassault, or other ?
Which are the best tanks in the world ?
Which are the best attack subs in the world (those to attack sea, and those to attack ground) ?
Which are the best Nuclear capability subs in the world ?
Which countries have the best anti-air systems in the world ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I love your military threads. I think you will attract only the primary interest of british and americans, most ever other country in the world has poor militaries. North Korea, China, India all have large military units, but they lack the ability to do with what they have that Americans and British can do with nearly identical and smaller numbers of soldiers. Those three countries cannot sail around half away around the world, start two wars, and draw only the protest of straw eating tree huggers.
 
  • #3
I know there's also quantity, and not just quality

but its not the millitary strength I am interested in , its in the quality
 

1. What factors contribute to a country's army being considered high quality?

There are several factors that contribute to a country's army being considered high quality. These include training and discipline of soldiers, advanced weaponry and technology, experienced and effective leadership, and sufficient funding and resources.

2. How is the quality of an army measured?

The quality of an army can be measured in a variety of ways, including combat effectiveness, readiness for deployment, success in previous conflicts, and overall morale and cohesion of troops.

3. Does the size of a country's army determine its quality?

No, the size of a country's army does not necessarily determine its quality. While a larger army may have more resources and manpower, it is ultimately the training, technology, and leadership that determines the quality of an army.

4. Can a country's army improve in quality over time?

Yes, a country's army can certainly improve in quality over time. This can be achieved through investments in training and technology, as well as effective leadership and learning from past conflicts.

5. How does the quality of a country's army affect its overall national security?

The quality of a country's army is a crucial factor in its overall national security. A high-quality army is better equipped to defend against external threats and maintain stability within the country, while a low-quality army can leave a country vulnerable to attack and internal conflicts.

Similar threads

  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
970
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
28
Views
10K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top