A Would a larger Martian moon create a stronger magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
A larger Martian moon could theoretically create a stronger magnetic field through tidal forces, but significant challenges exist. The magnetic field on Mars is primarily generated by the movement of its liquid core, which is believed to be inactive. Engineering a large moon in the right orbit might reheat Mars' core through tidal friction, but this would require an exceptionally large moon and a close orbit. The largest asteroid, Ceres, could potentially serve this purpose, but the feasibility of such an endeavor is highly questionable. Additionally, the moon would face extreme tidal stress, risking disintegration.
Nick Michaud
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have read a previous forum discussing the possibility of creating a stronger magnetic field on Mars using tidal forces by putting a larger moon in orbit around Mars. My question is how large of an object would it have to be compared to Mars and how distant would its orbit need to be from the planet?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi there
welcome to PF :smile:

Nick Michaud said:
I have read a previous forum discussing the possibility of creating a stronger magnetic field on Mars using tidal forces by putting a larger moon in orbit around Mars. My question is how large of an object would it have to be compared to Mars and how distant would its orbit need to be from the planet?

do you know/understand how a planetary magnetic field is created, eg Earths one ?

then see how that fits in with a larger or smaller moonDAve
 
probably we can not create such a moon for Mars :) the magnetic field is produced from inside of planet. I mean the core and the movement around it. instead of moon, we can struggle with inside of mars, it can be easier..
 
A magnetic field for a planet is generated by movement of the liquid core.
Mars' core is thought to be no longer liquid which explains why it only has weak residual magnetic fields.
If a very large moon was engineered into the right orbit, it could *possibly* result in the core reheating due to tidal friction.
I don't think the result would be very predictable though, and it would need to be a really big moon with a close orbit to reheat the interior of Mars significantly.
I guess the largest asteroid Ceres might do the job, but there is of course no way or any forseeable way to actually achieve that. (It's about 1/7 of the the size of Mars itself).
A problem with the scenario is that this Moon would experience even greater tidal stress than Mars, so there is the possibility it might disintegrate
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top