Writing Net Ionic Equations: How to Include Physical States and Charges

AI Thread Summary
When writing net ionic equations, it's essential to indicate physical states using the abbreviations (s), (l), (g), and (aq) for solid, liquid, gas, and aqueous solutions, respectively. The total ionic equation for the reaction of lithium carbonate with hydrochloric acid should include charges on the ionic species. The initial attempt presented was Li2CO3(aq) + 2HCl(aq) → H2CO3(l) + 2LiCl(aq), but this does not represent a complete ionic equation. A correct total ionic equation would break down the reactants and products into their respective ions, showing their charges. Understanding these components is crucial for accurately writing net ionic equations.
chick06
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When writing chemical formulas in Mastering, indicate the physical states using the abbreviation , , or for solid, liquid, or gas, respectively. Use for aqueous solution.

Write the total ionic equation (also known as the complete ionic equation) for the reaction of lithium carbonate with hydrochloric acid. Be sure to include the charges on the ionic species.



2. The attempt at a solution
This is what i came up with Li2CO3(aq)+2HCl(aq)---->H2CO3(l)+2LiCl(aq)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you wrote is not an ionic equation.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top