X-Ray Burning Lens: Why Can't it Focus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lufc88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens Ray
AI Thread Summary
High-energy X-rays cannot be focused like visible light due to their near-unity index of refraction in glass, making traditional lenses ineffective. Instead, techniques such as crystal diffraction and glancing incidence reflection are employed to manipulate X-ray paths. Ordinary glass absorbs X-rays and is only transparent to specific parts of the electromagnetic spectrum, limiting its utility for focusing X-rays. Each wavelength requires different materials and configurations for effective focusing, as no substance mimics glass's behavior for X-rays. X-ray telescopes utilize specially shaped metal surfaces to achieve focus through oblique reflection.
lufc88
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I know that High-energy (hard) X-ray light cannot be focused as easily as visible light by using a burning glass. But why is this? If there was x ray light spread over a normal sized lens with the same intensity as sun light why couldn't it focus? would the material needed for say 50cm^2 magnifying glass light focuser object need to be special?
could very intense radio waves in the same manner be focused over the same area or any other em waves?
whats special about sunlight?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The index of refraction for x-rays in glass is very close to 1; thus you cannot form a converging lens for this case.

A common technique is to use a crystal that is bent - the x-rays that are diffracted by the crystal structure are "captured" along the selected crystal paths ... and exit where you want them.

You can also use glancing incidence reflection, but the angles are very low ... both techniques are used in this paper which discusses the theory and experiment:
https://www.uni-due.de/agbovensiepen/Publikationen/REVSCI99.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lufc88 said:
whats special about sunlight?

Glass is transparent for only part of the electromagnetic spectrum; for ordinary glass it absorbs starting in the UV at one end, and the infrared at the other.

You need to select the correct materials for part of the spectrum. Even then each wavelength will have a slightly different focal length: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/aber2.html
 
There is not, ifaik, any substance that will behave, for X rays, the same as glass does for light - i.e. have a high enough refractive index without high transmission loss. X ray telescopes use the oblique reflection on the surface of a metal surface. Rays hitting the metal at near normal incidence will penetrate the surface. The surface is part of a paraboloid, way off axis (up on one side of the paraboloid surface). This link shows how an image can be focussed, using several paraboloid surfaces. To get the image focussed correctly, they also incorporate hyperboloid reflectors.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top