X-ray tube Questions - Accelerating electrons, Why X-rays

AI Thread Summary
X-rays are both electromagnetic waves and photons, exhibiting wave-particle duality. They are emitted when high-speed electrons collide with the anode in an X-ray tube, producing X-rays rather than other electromagnetic waves due to the specific energy levels involved. While electrons do emit lower frequency electromagnetic waves during acceleration from the cathode to the anode, these are not X-rays because the acceleration is significantly less than at the point of collision. The frequency of emitted radiation is directly related to the speed of the electrons upon impact with the anode. Overall, the discussion clarifies the mechanisms of X-ray production and the conditions necessary for their emission.
nousername
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Hey guys,

I have a couple of questions regarding X-rays and how they are produced.

1) Is an X-ray an electromagnetic wave or a photon?

2) Why is it that when the electrons collide with the anode in an x-ray tube, X-rays are emitted and not any other electromagnetic wave/photon?

3) When the electrons are being accelerated from cathode to the anode by the potential difference applied across the X-ray tube, how come they don't emit an electromagnetic wave? According to maxwells theory of electromagnetism, electromagnetic waves are emitted when an electron is accelerating. And isn't this how electrons emit electromagnetic waves in antennas? So how come these ones dont?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kirollos said:
Hey guys,

I have a couple of questions regarding X-rays and how they are produced.

1) Is an X-ray an electromagnetic wave or a photon?

Yes.

(Remember that visible light is a photon _and_ a transverse eletromagnetic wave, depending on how you measure it. The same is true for other rays. An x-ray is made of photons, and, therefore, is an e-m wave.)

kirollos said:
2) Why is it that when the electrons collide with the anode in an x-ray tube, X-rays are emitted and not any other electromagnetic wave/photon?

It is difficult to answer these types of questions without access to the Internets.

[See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray]

(;


Apparently, Roentgen had to put cardboard around his cathode ray tube and paint the screen opaque in order to conceal the other electromagnetic radiation that was visible. In fact, the X-rays are visible to the dark-adjusted naked eye if the energy level is sufficient.


kirollos said:
3) When the electrons are being accelerated from cathode to the anode by the potential difference applied across the X-ray tube, how come they don't emit an electromagnetic wave? According to maxwells theory of electromagnetism, electromagnetic waves are emitted when an electron is accelerating. And isn't this how electrons emit electromagnetic waves in antennas? So how come these ones dont?

I sorry that I don't know why you claim they don't get emitted. This is exactly how the X (or "unknown") particle/wave is emitted for diagnostic imaging. But visible light and many other wavelengths of radiation do not go through solid objects, such as skulls or mamary glands.



Cheers,
Mesmer8
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey, thanks for the answer.

With question 3), the X-rays get emitted when they collide with anode, wright? Not when they are being accelerated as far as i have been taught. If it is emitted while they are being accelerated, then how come they need to collide the electrons with the anode and all that?

Thanks :)
 
kirollos said:
1) Is an X-ray an electromagnetic wave or a photon?
Both models can be applied here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave–particle_duality

kirollos said:
2) Why is it that when the electrons collide with the anode in an x-ray tube, X-rays are emitted and not any other electromagnetic wave/photon?
The frequency of emitted radiation depends on the acceleration. If they would hit the anode at lower speed, they would emit lower frequencies.

kirollos said:
3) When the electrons are being accelerated from cathode to the anode by the potential difference applied across the X-ray tube, how come they don't emit an electromagnetic wave?
They do, but the magnitude of acceleration is much lower here, compared to when they hit the anode. So it is a much lower frequency, not X-rays.

If found a nice animation on this here:
http://www.tapir.caltech.edu/~teviet/Waves/empulse.html

field_a.gif


This is what happens with the E-field when an electron suddenly starts moving, with short period of large acceleration. As you see high frequency (short wave length) radiation goes mostly perpendicular to the direction of acceleration.

In the X-ray tube the acceleration by the field is negligible compared to the acceleration on anode impact. So the animation above shows approximately what happens in the initial rest frame of the electron during anode impact (anode comes from the right and hits the electron). In reality, due to the acceleration by the field, the lines would be slightly bend initially. But the X-ray is the sharp distortion of the filed lines, emitted on impact.

Here more nice diagrams:
http://physics.tamuk.edu/~suson/html/4323/photons.html#Electromagnetic Radiation from Charge
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WOW! Thanks guys, youre awesomne. All my questions were answered!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top