Medical Xray diagnostics mutagenic and so genocide effect on genome

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the risks of X-ray exposure for women who are not currently pregnant but may wish to conceive in the future. Concerns are raised about the potential genetic impact of diagnostic X-rays on pre-zygote oöcytes, suggesting that low doses could cause deletions in DNA that might affect future offspring. However, it is clarified that while there is always some risk associated with X-ray exposure, the level of risk is significantly lower for pre-zygote oöcytes compared to embryos or fetuses, which are more susceptible to radiation damage. The conversation also touches on the body's DNA repair mechanisms, emphasizing that many mutations caused by radiation exposure are often fatal to developing embryos or lead to spontaneous abortion. The thread concludes with a note on the importance of informed decision-making regarding X-ray use in women who may become pregnant.
guidoeg
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
They worry only about X-rays risks during pregnancy but not in pre-gravid wonen on pre-zygote oöcytes:

https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=abdominct

«Women should always inform their physician and the CT technologist if there is any possibility that they may be pregnant»

But if a woman wants babies but is not just pregnant, she can take X-rays without any risk for future offspring?

Genocide effect of Medical X-rays on genome.
This is a thinking quality of mine how low doses of diagnostics X-rays probably inflict scattered deletions in subtelomeric regions of human chromosomes in pre-zygocyte oöcytes: CAT train of X-ray waves, for frequency and energy, jump electrons of the Carbon to a quantum leap over a major potential orbital, and then go back once the excitement has been exhausted; the electron disappears in its original orbital and reappears in the upper one. Gravity has nothing to do with it: the electron orbit swaying around the nucleus according to forces of electric charge.
X-rays also useless but required by the unprepared doctor, obsessed by diagnostic doubts or for medicalizing future people.
The DNA Carbon atoms must handle four different bonds and, disturbing the electronic orbits, one atom can go detached and the result is a deletion: a hole in the genetic heritage of your future children. Electron dances according to a wavy hexagonal flower trajectory, and performs quantum jumps on more external orbits caused by the X-ray wave.
Conversely, in Nature, the "old" electron loses energy and jumps* to a more internal orbital with lower potential.
Excited by X-rays directed on pre-zygote oöcytes, the electron disappears and appears on a higher orbit by having acquired the energy of the radiographer or of the tomograph on the internal genitalia.
Atomic elementare heavier than iron are created by stars bigger than the Sun where also melt helium and so they form atoms heavier than iron which then decay. And thus emitting, as a result of the electronic cascade towards the inside of the nucleus, an electron together with a neutrin. The overall excess of electrons with respect to the positrons in matter creates both the magnetic field and emits gravitons; this is why a flow of positrons in the opposite direction towards gravity (Vimāna) cancels the gravitational field.

* Natural Atomic decay: quantum leap in lower orbital ("natural decay" evident in radioactive elements), intuitively because the atomic nucleus "by aging" loses a negative microcharge and the electron approaches to the nucleus.
The atom ages for progressive depletion of the residual energy from the Big Bang. In an atom, the distance between the electron and the protoneutronic nucleus represents an excess of negative charges with respect to the positive in matter.

Am an italian MD -- not English

Guido Emanuele Galasso
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
guidoeg said:
But if a woman wants babies but is not just pregnant, she can take X-rays without any risk for future offspring?

No, there is always a risk. However, before becoming pregnant, an egg cell is very, very small and is only exposed to the small amount of radiation that would pass through itself. An embryo or fetus is much, much larger and would absorb a much larger amount of radiation during a time when any damage to the DNA in any of its cells can be catastrophic. Still, women should always be informed about the dangers that x-rays pose so that they may make an informed decision.

The rest of your post makes little sense and gets more and more strange the further down I read.
 
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
DNA has repair mechanisms. It evolved to do it's job on a planet with background radiation. Original post appears unaware of that. When DNA has a delete it cannot fix, the cell normally dies - apoptosis - sort of like cell suicide. Most mutations caused by "successful" deletes (limiting just to that) are fatal to offspring - if the change occurred in the cells that later become sperm or egg, the fetus never develops, or you get a spontaneous abortion. In adults a whole lot of other DNA-bound molecules like histones and methyl groups have to be in place before the zapped DNA can have a serious effect. Many chemicals in our environment work the same way on DNA. The process is generally called teratogenesis. Example: thalidomide is a known teratogen.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
With Jim's excellent reply, this thread will remain closed.
 
Popular article referring to the BA.2 variant: Popular article: (many words, little data) https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/health/ba-2-covid-severity/index.html Preprint article referring to the BA.2 variant: Preprint article: (At 52 pages, too many words!) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1.full.pdf [edited 1hr. after posting: Added preprint Abstract] Cheers, Tom
Back
Top