Xyx^-1y^-1 a Lie group homomorphism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sajet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Lie group
Sajet
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi! I was just going through this script on Lie groups: http://www.mit.edu/~ssam/repthy.pdf

At one point the following is said:

(see attachment)

I've spent multiple hours trying to figure out why this is a group homomorphism. Sure, once you know the theorem is correct, this follows. But without knowing this, I can't figure out why it should be.

I want to see that:

\varphi_y(x_1x_2) = \varphi_y(x_1)\varphi_y(x_2) \Leftrightarrow x_1x_2yx_2^{-1}x_1^{-1}y^{-1} = x_1yx_1^{-1}y^{-1}x_2yx_2^{-1}y^{-1}


If I write x_1y = \bar y_1x_1, x_2y = \bar y_2x_2, then the above equation is equivalent to

x_1\bar y_2x_1^{-1} = \bar y_1y^{-1}\bar y_2

but I don't get any further from here.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.jpg
    Untitled-1.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 537
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyways, I think whether or not this is a homomorphism is not necessary for this proof. One can just argue that this map is smooth since G is a Lie group, therefore the image under G is connected, therefore it is a one point set and since eye-1y-1 = e one gets that this set must be exactly {e}.
 
Sajet said:
Anyways, I think whether or not this is a homomorphism is not necessary for this proof. One can just argue that this map is smooth since G is a Lie group, therefore the image under G is connected, therefore it is a one point set and since eye-1y-1 = e one gets that this set must be exactly {e}.



I agree with you: I can't either see how that map is a homomorphism in a general case, but it is unnecessary to consider it that way.

DonAntonio
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
450
2
Replies
93
Views
11K
2
Replies
61
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
2
Replies
52
Views
12K
Back
Top