Yarman Geometric Norm or Impedence Normalization

AI Thread Summary
Normalization of impedance in antenna network optimization involves adjusting all impedance values to a standard reference, typically 1 ohm, by dividing each value by the system's characteristic impedance, such as 50 or 75 ohms. The Yarman geometric norm, referenced in the software manual, is not widely documented online, making it challenging to find detailed information. Users suggest that this norm may relate to specific techniques used in antenna design, particularly in conjunction with real frequency methods. The discussion highlights the need for further resources or contact with the software's creators for clarification. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effectively utilizing the software for antenna optimization.
anothnagle
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm working with some old software to optimize antenna networks, and I've come across some stuff that I don't understand. For the software to run, all impedence values entered must be normalized to 1 ohm. What does it mean to normalize an impedence and how do I do it? Also, the manual for the software keeps referring to a Yarman geometric norm when it talks about normalizing these impedences. What is a Yarman geometric norm?

I apologize if I sound daft. Any help would be much appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
anothnagle said:
I'm working with some old software to optimize antenna networks, and I've come across some stuff that I don't understand. For the software to run, all impedence values entered must be normalized to 1 ohm. What does it mean to normalize an impedence and how do I do it? Also, the manual for the software keeps referring to a Yarman geometric norm when it talks about normalizing these impedences. What is a Yarman geometric norm?

I apologize if I sound daft. Any help would be much appreciated!

Hmm. Google is not very helpful with Yarman geometric norm, which is strange.

I'd guess that normalization would just be dividing all impedances by the characteristic impedance of the system you are working with (50 Ohms or 75 Ohms, etc.). But I suppose it could be more complicated than that.

The manual doesn't list any references? Does the company still exist and have a website? If not, do you see any author names that you could try to figure out how to contact to ask your questions?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks Aleph! :smile:
 
Oh, okay! That actually makes more sense considering that the software uses the real frequency technique.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top