Yarman Geometric Norm or Impedence Normalization

AI Thread Summary
Normalization of impedance in antenna network optimization involves adjusting all impedance values to a standard reference, typically 1 ohm, by dividing each value by the system's characteristic impedance, such as 50 or 75 ohms. The Yarman geometric norm, referenced in the software manual, is not widely documented online, making it challenging to find detailed information. Users suggest that this norm may relate to specific techniques used in antenna design, particularly in conjunction with real frequency methods. The discussion highlights the need for further resources or contact with the software's creators for clarification. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effectively utilizing the software for antenna optimization.
anothnagle
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm working with some old software to optimize antenna networks, and I've come across some stuff that I don't understand. For the software to run, all impedence values entered must be normalized to 1 ohm. What does it mean to normalize an impedence and how do I do it? Also, the manual for the software keeps referring to a Yarman geometric norm when it talks about normalizing these impedences. What is a Yarman geometric norm?

I apologize if I sound daft. Any help would be much appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
anothnagle said:
I'm working with some old software to optimize antenna networks, and I've come across some stuff that I don't understand. For the software to run, all impedence values entered must be normalized to 1 ohm. What does it mean to normalize an impedence and how do I do it? Also, the manual for the software keeps referring to a Yarman geometric norm when it talks about normalizing these impedences. What is a Yarman geometric norm?

I apologize if I sound daft. Any help would be much appreciated!

Hmm. Google is not very helpful with Yarman geometric norm, which is strange.

I'd guess that normalization would just be dividing all impedances by the characteristic impedance of the system you are working with (50 Ohms or 75 Ohms, etc.). But I suppose it could be more complicated than that.

The manual doesn't list any references? Does the company still exist and have a website? If not, do you see any author names that you could try to figure out how to contact to ask your questions?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks Aleph! :smile:
 
Oh, okay! That actually makes more sense considering that the software uses the real frequency technique.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top