Yes, another request for Optics book recommendations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a suitable optics textbook for self-study, particularly for a first-year optics course that requires minimal calculus. The original textbook used at the university, "Introduction to Classical and Modern Optics" by Jurgen Meyer-Arendt, is deemed unengaging by several contributors. Alternatives mentioned include "Pedrotti's Optics," which, while better, still falls short of expectations due to its mathematical level and differing sign conventions. "Optics" by Eugene Hecht is recommended for its visual appeal and conversational tone, though it is noted to be more mathematically intensive. Additionally, "Fundamentals of Optics" by Jenkins and White is suggested as a widely used resource among undergraduates. The consensus highlights the challenge of finding a definitive optics textbook that excels in all areas, emphasizing the value of supplementary resources like Wikipedia for broader understanding.
bluebottle
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm not looking forward to optics so I wanted to do some self-study, like learn the topic on my own and ask to write the final.

It's basically a first year optics course, no calculus beyond high school is really required.
My university uses the optics textbook "Introduction to Classical and Modern Optics" by Jurgen Meyer-Arendt (https://www.amazon.com/dp/013124356X/?tag=pfamazon01-20).

It really doesn't look like a riveting book.

Can you give me some recommendations for a good optics textbook that covers all the bases? i.e. geometrical and wave optics, reflection, refraction, lenses, matrix methods, aberrations, gradient index phenomena (fibre optics, interference, holography, coherence, polarisation, Fraunhofer and Fresnel diffraction)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've taught optics from Meyer-Arendt in the past, and wasn't too thrilled with it, either. I now use Pedrotti^3 which is at a similar level. Frankly, I'm not thrilled with it, either, but other optics books seem to assume a higher mathematical level, and at least P^3 uses the standard sign convention for object/image distances whereas M-A uses a different convention which can be confusing if you're also referring to other sources.

For my own reading, I like Hecht and use it as an alternate source to look up stuff. It has lots of nifty pictures, and a more conversational tone than most other textbooks. Many students (including some who have posted here) consider it to be too wordy. I actually enjoy reading it, myself. But de gustibus non disputandum est, and all that. It does get more mathematical than either M-A or P^3, and starts out with a discussion of Maxwell's equations and electromagnetic waves, which you can safely skip over if you want to start with the geometrical optics which follows.
 
jtbell said:
I've taught optics from Meyer-Arendt in the past, and wasn't too thrilled with it, either.

My experience as well.
 
Well, thank you. I guess there's not one book that leaves all the others behind, eh? :/
 
Be no stranger to Wikipedia. Read all you can.
 
Hi,
you should try "Fundamentals of Optics" by Jenkins and White which is being used by many undergrads around the world.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Back
Top