Yes, another request for Optics book recommendations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a suitable optics textbook for self-study, particularly for a first-year optics course that requires minimal calculus. The original textbook used at the university, "Introduction to Classical and Modern Optics" by Jurgen Meyer-Arendt, is deemed unengaging by several contributors. Alternatives mentioned include "Pedrotti's Optics," which, while better, still falls short of expectations due to its mathematical level and differing sign conventions. "Optics" by Eugene Hecht is recommended for its visual appeal and conversational tone, though it is noted to be more mathematically intensive. Additionally, "Fundamentals of Optics" by Jenkins and White is suggested as a widely used resource among undergraduates. The consensus highlights the challenge of finding a definitive optics textbook that excels in all areas, emphasizing the value of supplementary resources like Wikipedia for broader understanding.
bluebottle
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm not looking forward to optics so I wanted to do some self-study, like learn the topic on my own and ask to write the final.

It's basically a first year optics course, no calculus beyond high school is really required.
My university uses the optics textbook "Introduction to Classical and Modern Optics" by Jurgen Meyer-Arendt (https://www.amazon.com/dp/013124356X/?tag=pfamazon01-20).

It really doesn't look like a riveting book.

Can you give me some recommendations for a good optics textbook that covers all the bases? i.e. geometrical and wave optics, reflection, refraction, lenses, matrix methods, aberrations, gradient index phenomena (fibre optics, interference, holography, coherence, polarisation, Fraunhofer and Fresnel diffraction)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've taught optics from Meyer-Arendt in the past, and wasn't too thrilled with it, either. I now use Pedrotti^3 which is at a similar level. Frankly, I'm not thrilled with it, either, but other optics books seem to assume a higher mathematical level, and at least P^3 uses the standard sign convention for object/image distances whereas M-A uses a different convention which can be confusing if you're also referring to other sources.

For my own reading, I like Hecht and use it as an alternate source to look up stuff. It has lots of nifty pictures, and a more conversational tone than most other textbooks. Many students (including some who have posted here) consider it to be too wordy. I actually enjoy reading it, myself. But de gustibus non disputandum est, and all that. It does get more mathematical than either M-A or P^3, and starts out with a discussion of Maxwell's equations and electromagnetic waves, which you can safely skip over if you want to start with the geometrical optics which follows.
 
jtbell said:
I've taught optics from Meyer-Arendt in the past, and wasn't too thrilled with it, either.

My experience as well.
 
Well, thank you. I guess there's not one book that leaves all the others behind, eh? :/
 
Be no stranger to Wikipedia. Read all you can.
 
Hi,
you should try "Fundamentals of Optics" by Jenkins and White which is being used by many undergrads around the world.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Back
Top