Is Point P in Young's Double Slit Experiment the Center of the Central Minimum?

AI Thread Summary
In Young's Double Slit Experiment, when light rays strike the slits at an angle θ = sin^(-1)(λ/2d), Point P on the screen is identified as the center of the central minimum due to destructive interference. The necessary condition for minima is that the path difference Δx equals nλ/2, leading to a phase difference of π between the waves from the two slits. The angle θ must be measured with respect to the normal to the plane of the slits for Point P to be on the central minimum. This results in the path length from the source to the furthest slit being 0.5λ longer than to the nearest slit, causing the waves to be out of phase. Thus, the superposition of these waves at Point P leads to destructive interference, confirming its position as the center of the central minimum.
pardesi
Messages
337
Reaction score
0
Q.Suppose that the the light rays in young's Double Slit experiment fall at an angle \theta=\sin^{-1}(\frac{\lambda}{2d}) .Then prove that the the Point P which is the symmetric point on screen between two slits is the centre of central minimum

Necessary Formulaes
for minima the waves should interfere destructively so the path difference \Delta x=\frac{n\lambda}{2}


ATTEMPT
i am not so sure of this but we can have a plane \pi,\pi^{'} with inclination \theta to the plane of slits and through the slits.the \perp distance of the Point P from the plane determines it's phase so the phase difference is difference between the length of perpendiculars from P to the planes =d \sin \theta=\frac{\lambda}{2} which produces destructive interference.

Doubt
My doubt lies on the fact that how do we apply difference in optical lengths concept here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When a plane wave front falls on the slits with an inclination theta,such that it satisfies the condition given in the problem, light coming from the two slits are not in phase. There phase difference is pi, i.e. they are out of phase. When the light from these two slits reach point P, even though they are equidistant from the point P, they produce distructive interference. So there is no need to apply difference in optical length concept.
 
Last edited:
why are they out of phase even though the distance is the same
 
What a confusingly worded question!

θ could be the angle between the incident rays and either a) the plane of the slits or b) the normal to the plane of the slits. It has to be b) for P to be on the central mimimum.

This leads to the path length from the source to the furthest slit being 0.5λ longer than to the nearest slit.

Using this information you can calculate the directions of the maxima and the minima applying the difference in optical lengths concept.
 
In this question a parallel beam of light is illuminating the slits and the plane wave front, which is perpendicular to the parallel beam, makes an angle θ with the plane of the slits.This leads to the path length from the source to the furthest slit being 0.5λ longer than to the nearest slit. So the waves coming from the two slits are not in phase but out of phase. When these waves superimpose at a point P equidistance from the two slits produce distructive interference.
 
thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top