Young's modulus of a copper wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an experiment to measure the Young's modulus of a copper wire by applying weights and measuring stress and strain. The user calculated stress using the force from weights and the cross-sectional area derived from the wire's diameter. However, the resulting graph showed a curve instead of a straight line, indicating potential issues with the experiment. Feedback suggests that the wire may have been stretched beyond its elastic limit, leading to permanent deformation. Clarification on units and ensuring the force remains within the elastic limit are essential for accurate results.
pizza1512
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi there! Can anyone help me with a problem.

I did an experiment at school trying to measure the Young's modulus of a copper wire. We attached one end of the copper wire to a clamp and then tied on weights of 100g at a time to the other end so that a force can be applied to the copper wire and so it stretches.

To work out Young's modulus, we require two things: the stress and the strain of the wire.

Stress is \sigma = \frac{F}{A} and strain is \varepsilon = \frac {\delta \ell}{\ell_o} \frac {change in length}{original length}.

To work out Stress, I worked out the Force applied on the wire by the weights (using the equation Force = Mass \times Gravitational potential energy) as 0.1kg \times 10 and this in turn produces 1N of force everytime a weight is added. To work out the area of the copper wire, I measured the diameter using a micrometer and this gave me an measurement of d=0.35mm. From this I worked out the cross section of the wire:

\frac{0.35}{2} (to find the radius), then squaring this and multiplying by \pi to obtain the area.

For stress I measured the original length of the wire (337cm) and then measured the extension of the wire and then dividing this by the original length.

My results table is attached.

When I try and plot the graph, I end up with a curved graph so the Young's modulus is not a straight line and so is the not directly proportional. Can anyone help me and tell me what I have done wrong in my experiment or is a curved line correct? Are my results alright?

Thanks

:shy:
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your extensions look too big. If your wire is 337 cm (?) then you've permanently stretched it if you got 27cm of stretch. Your table does not show all the units.

If the experimental force stayed within the elastic limit of the material, you would get a straight line.
 
what are the units?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top