Young's Two Slit Experiment Question

AI Thread Summary
In Young's Two Slit experiment, the equations for maxima and minima are based on the path difference created by light passing through two closely spaced slits. The confusion arises when considering the nature of light rays; while parallel light rays are used, the approximation holds true when the slit separation is much smaller than the distance to the screen. The light rays do not remain perfectly parallel as they propagate, allowing them to converge at a point on the screen. This convergence is a result of the geometric relationships and approximations used in deriving the equations. Understanding these approximations clarifies the apparent contradiction regarding parallel lines and their intersection.
Von Neumann
Messages
101
Reaction score
4
Question:

I'm sure this is a stupid question, but it has been bothering me lately so I'll ask it anyhow.

In Young's Two Slit experiment the conditions for max and min are

dsin\theta=m\lambda (max)

dsin\theta=(m+\frac{1}{2})\lambda (min)

where m is an integer and d is the separation of the slits and \theta is the angle the lower ray makes with the horizontal.

If the separation d of the slits is much smaller than the distance between the slits and a screen (on which they meet at point), these equations are said to be exact.

However, and this is what confuses me, if parallel light rays are used, the path difference is dsin\theta even if D is not much larger than d. (ie. placing the screen at the focal plane of a converging lens.) If the light rays are parallel, how could they ever focus at a point on the screen? By definition parallel lines never intersect.

I'm obviously misunderstanding something monumental, so I apologize in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This question is not stupid.:smile:
You just need to understand that those equations are derived making certain approximations. Check out my attachment.

Firstly, just see the two paths of light. Aren't they almost parallel? Well, not so parallel in my diagram but imagine a real life situation where d is of the order of micrometers and D is measured in meters. Got the picture? That's why people get dsinθ as the path difference. It is just an approximation. They actual rays do meet and are not parallel.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 469
The way it was worded by my professor (and his book) conveys the idea as though it is possible for parallel lines to intersect (which really was boggling my mind). I understand. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top