Zero velocity and zero acceleraton

  • Thread starter Thread starter Throwback24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity Zero
AI Thread Summary
An object can have zero velocity at a specific moment, such as a baseball at the top of its arc, but it will still have a non-zero total velocity if considering both x and y components. While the y-velocity is zero at the peak, the constant force of gravity means the object experiences a downward acceleration of 9.8 m/s² at all times. Even when stationary for an instant, the baseball has upward velocity just before and downward velocity just after, indicating ongoing acceleration. Therefore, zero velocity can occur momentarily, but zero acceleration does not apply in this scenario. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing projectile motion.
Throwback24
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If velocity is the change in position per unit time and acceleration measures the change in velocity of an object, can an object zero velocity or zero acceleration?

In terms of a baseball, the baseball stands still for a moment at the top. Would that mean it has zero velocity?

But does a baseball ever have zero acceleration? It doesn't speed up nor speed down at the at the arc, so would that be zero as well?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the baseball being thrown like projectile?

If it is thrown as a projectile it does always have a velocity, at least in the x direction.

In the y- direction it's y velocity is 0 at the highest point on the path, but the total velocity will still be non zero, unless it was thrown straight up.

Also, there is a constant nonzero force on the ball (gravity) at all times. What does this tell you about the acceleration of the ball at all times?
 
You are fairly close to understanding what is going on. If you throw the projectile straight up, it will have zero velocity at the top but the acceleration will always = 9.8 m/s/s downwards.

First it is only stationary (v=0) for a fraction of a fraction of a second.

Second it has an upwards velocity immediatly before and a downwards velocity immediatly afterwards. So it has to have a downwards acceleration.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top