Zeta Function -1 1/2 and prime numbers

Niaboc67
Messages
249
Reaction score
3
I talked with an old friend of mine. We discussed prime numbers and Ulams Spiral, and the mathematical patterns that surround us all. He brought up something called the Zeta-Function and something about -1 1/2 and how this all related to prime numbers. I did a google search and found some interesting results but didn't quite find enough on the purpose of -1 1/2, guess I should have dug a little deeper. Anyways could someone please explain the Zeta Function and why it is important and purposeful, as well as it's correlation to prime numbers and -1 1/2.

Thank You
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know where -1 1/2 comes from. There is a famous open question in mathematics (called the Riemann hypothesis) which says that in the strip in the complex plane (0<x<1, where x is the real part of z) the only zeroes of the zeta function are along the line x = 1/2.

Start here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top