Recent content by ertagon2
-
MHB Understanding Determinants of 2 x 2 Matrices
Can some1 help me with these?- ertagon2
- Thread
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
MHB Solve Maths Sequences & Series - Get Passing Grade Now
Can someone help me with these. These are the last 5 questions that I have to do and if I get them right I pass maths.- ertagon2
- Thread
- Sequences Sequences and series Series
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
MHB Are These Polynomial Factorizations Correct in Z7?
Can someone check if my answers are right and help me with the missing ones.- ertagon2
- Thread
- Induction Polynomials
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
MHB Sequences and their limits, convergence, supremum etc.
Could someone check if my answers are right and help me with question 5?- ertagon2
- Thread
- Convergence Limits Sequences Supremum
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
MHB Maximal Elements in a Bounded Set
I don't think I understand. Can you elaborate?- ertagon2
- Post #4
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
MHB Maximal Elements in a Bounded Set
Could someone please check these questions? Please correct them if necessary, with an explanation if you could.- ertagon2
- Thread
- Sets
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
MHB Set Theory Questions (check if right)
Re: Set Theory Questions (check if irght) Oh nvm I was thinking about countable and uncaountable.- ertagon2
- Post #7
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
MHB Set Theory Questions (check if right)
Re: Set Theory Questions (check if irght) Isn't there a finite number of rational numbers for 4<x<6 ?- ertagon2
- Post #5
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
MHB Set Theory Questions (check if right)
Re: Set Theory Questions (check if irght) Which one? Looks alright to me.- ertagon2
- Post #3
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
MHB Set Theory Questions (check if right)
Could someone please check if these are right?- ertagon2
- Thread
- Set Set theory Theory
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
MHB Valid Arguments: Sets Explained
So I did answer everything correctly? Can you please explain 6.(3) Why is it $\therefore$p$\implies$r rather than p$\therefore$r <--this is what I meant- ertagon2
- Post #3
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
MHB Valid Arguments: Sets Explained
is this right ?6(1). p$\implies$q, $\lnot$q$\therefore\lnot$p, Modus tollens 6(2). p$\implies$q, q$\implies$r, q$\therefore$r, Transitivity 6(3). p$\implies$q, q$\therefore$p. Converse fallacy 7. I have no idea what I'm doing please explain.- ertagon2
- Thread
- Sets
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
MHB Integration by parts, Partial fraction expansion, Improper Integrals
so =$\frac{1}{4}$ ? -
MHB Integration by parts, Partial fraction expansion, Improper Integrals
- check if right check if right Now, 2 seems to be the right answer for A yet when i made x=5 and subtracted new form form the old one I got a difference of ~$\frac{4}{9}$ (should be 0 obviously) I got A=2 B=$\frac{45}{21}$ C=2 How to calculate $\lim_{{x}\to{\infty}}(- e^{-x})$ -
MHB Is Understanding Calculus Derivatives Really That Difficult?
Side question how is this du=3sin(3x)dxallowed ? I thought that du/dx is more of a notation than a fraction.