Recent content by unified
-
U
Use relativity and the Larmor formula to calculate Lienard's formula
To clarify, in the book by Griffiths, we have ##p^\mu \equiv m\frac{d}{d\tau}\eta^\mu## and ##E \equiv cp^0##, so by definition, ##\frac{dE}{d\tau} = c\frac{dp^0}{d\tau} = m\frac{\mathbf u \cdot \mathbf a}{(1 - u^2/c^2)^2}##. Evaluating the proper power in a coordinate system where the particle...- unified
- Post #3
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
U
Use relativity and the Larmor formula to calculate Lienard's formula
I also posted this on the physics stack exchange. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/818840/lienards-formula-from-the-larmor-formula-and-relativity- unified
- Post #2
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
U
Use relativity and the Larmor formula to calculate Lienard's formula
I am trying to understand the solution to exercise 12.71 in the document linked below which accompanies Griffith's book on electrodynamics. The problem states that we are to use the Larmor formula and relativity to derive the Lienard formula. $$Larmor \ {} formula: P = \frac{\mu_0q^2a^2}{6\pi c}...- unified
- Thread
- Electrodynamics Relativity
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
U
Undergrad Why are rotated parallel axes still parallel?
Yes, that's correct. My motivation for asking this question is that the popular derivation of the formula for a generalized Lorentz transformation uses a rotation of the axes in this way, and it's assumed that they remain parallel. Let me clarify. Suppose S and S' have axes aligned with...- unified
- Post #4
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
U
Undergrad Why are rotated parallel axes still parallel?
I tried posting this on the physicsstackexchange, but wasn't making any progress in understanding what's going on. Suppose the axes in two coordinate systems S, S' are parallel. Now, suppose I rotate S through some angle ##\theta## and also rotate S' through the same angle ##\theta## It's not...- unified
- Thread
- Angle Axes
- Replies: 5
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
U
What Explains the Lack of Current in a PN Junction at Equilibrium?
phyzguy, A sketch would include four currents, two from the field (electrons move against the field, holes with the field) and two due to random thermal motions (electrons from P to N, holes from N to P). In equilibrium these effects cancel.- unified
- Post #3
- Forum: Electrical Engineering
-
U
What Explains the Lack of Current in a PN Junction at Equilibrium?
Consider a PN junction doped with say phosphorous on the N side, and Boron on the P side. Initially, there is an opportunity for the electrons just below the N conduction band to drop to the lower available energy states just above the P valence band. This leaves the N side positively charged...- unified
- Thread
- Condensed matter Equilibrium Junction Pn junction
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Electrical Engineering
-
U
Undergrad Phase Speed of Wave in non-relativistic Doppler Shift Derivation
To answer my own question, we are comparing the frequency measured by the ground observer -- who is at rest relative to the medium air -- with that measured by an observer moving with the siren and at rest relative to the air. Since they are both at rest relative to the air, they will measure...- unified
- Post #2
- Forum: Classical Physics
-
U
Undergrad Phase Speed of Wave in non-relativistic Doppler Shift Derivation
Consider the situation where an observer at rest on the ground measures the frequency of a siren which is moving away from the observer at speed ##v_{Ex}##. Let ##v_w## be the speed of the sound wave. Let ##\lambda_0##, ##f_0##, ##\lambda_D##, and ##f_D## be the wavelengths and frequencies...- unified
- Thread
- Derivation Doppler Doppler shift Phase Shift Speed Wave
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Classical Physics
-
U
How Can We Generalize the Lorentz Transformation to Two Dimensions?
If what I have is a valid transformation, then I'm confused about what is calculating. Given the coordinates in S, does it give the coordinates in S(bar)?- unified
- Post #6
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
U
How Can We Generalize the Lorentz Transformation to Two Dimensions?
I noticed that of course. But, isn't it true that the matrix gives S(bar) in terms of S? I don't see how the logic could be wrong. We give S(bar) in terms of S' and S' in terms of S, thus S(bar) in terms of S. I agree the formula is not a boost, but isn't it still correct?- unified
- Post #4
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
U
How Can We Generalize the Lorentz Transformation to Two Dimensions?
Summary: The problem is to generalize the Lorentz transformation to two dimensions. Relevant Equations Lorentz Transformation along the positive x-axis: $$ \begin{pmatrix} \bar{x^0} \\ \bar{x^1} \\ \bar{x^2} \\ \bar{x^3} \\ \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \gamma & -\gamma \beta & 0 & 0 \\...- unified
- Thread
- generalized Lorentz Lorentz transformation Lorentz transformations Special relativity Transformation
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
U
Graduate The Angular Momentum of an Electric and Magnetic Charge
The formula for the integral is correct and produces the correct angular momentum. Yet, using the other coordinate system, I'm left with an integral which is divergent according to Mathematica. I mean the system with the origin as the midpoint between the charges. You can try writing down the...- unified
- Post #7
- Forum: Electromagnetism
-
U
Graduate The Angular Momentum of an Electric and Magnetic Charge
Excellent answer, however in your example of the point mass, you are finding the angular momentum relative to 1. Where the particle itself is by placing it at the origin. 2. Some other location. In my example, I found the angular momentum relative to 1. The location of the electric charge. 2...- unified
- Post #3
- Forum: Electromagnetism
-
U
Graduate The Angular Momentum of an Electric and Magnetic Charge
Relevant Equations: Angular momentum density stored in an electromagnetic field: $$\vec{l}_{em} = \epsilon_0[\vec{r} \times (\vec{E} \times \vec{B})]$$ Electric field of an electric charge: $$\frac{q_e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{r - r'}{|r - r'|^3}$$ Magnetic field of a magnetic charge...- unified
- Thread
- Angular Angular momentum Charge Electric Electro dynamics Magnetic Momentum
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Electromagnetism