Lorentz force -> Current in a gradient field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of calculating error currents in a rotating gradiometer using a superconducting loop in a magnetic field gradient. The primary concern is the effect of the Lorentz force on electron velocities, which leads to non-physical results during integration. One issue is a term that suggests current persists even when velocity is zero, while another initially indicated a ramp effect that was later resolved. The author seeks collaboration to further explore the velocity dependence of the current and invites others to engage in the discussion. The complexities of integrating the Lorentz force in this context highlight significant challenges in accurately modeling the system.
Pogo
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is doing my nut in. I'm looking at causes of errors in a rotating gradiometer. It uses a loop of superconductor formed so that the current in the loop is proportional to the gradient of the magnetic field threading the loop.

I think that an error current will arise due to the Lorentz force acting on the charges in the loop as it rotates in a field with a gradient. I'm approaching the problem by calculating the velocity of the electrons in each vertical arm of the loop, then summing.

To calculate the electron velocity, I have to integrate the acceleration due to the Lorentz force. When I integrate, I get two non-physical results. The first is a 1/omega term that cancels the omega term in the tangential velocity. That means that the current that was caused by the velocity persists when the velocity is zero. The second is a ramp term that arises from the integration. Electron velocity (current) is proportional to time which is again non-physical)

I'd be happy to provide diagrams and answer further questions, but I don't want to lead anyone down the same wrong path (if it is wrong) to get the same answers.

Would someone like to look at this with me?

Cheers;

Pogo.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Further to this, I have been able to eliminate the second problem, the ramp, because the individual currents oppose, so one ramp cancels another. Now, if the velocity dependence would reappear...
 
Back
Top