Potential difference, electric potential energy and work

AI Thread Summary
To determine the work required to move charge q2 to infinity, it is necessary to calculate the change in electric potential energy (PEe). This involves finding the total potential energy of all four charges and subtracting the potential energy of the three charges without q2. The difference in these energies represents the work needed to move q2. An alternative and simpler approach is to calculate the electric potential at q2's position due to the three stationary charges. This method streamlines the process of finding the work required.
r_swayze
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Four charges are arranged at the corners of a rectangle as shown in the diagram. How much work needs to be done to move the charge q2 to infinity?

Since change in PEe = W, am I suppose to find total potential electric energy of the four charges and then subtract the total potential electric energy of the three charges without q2? Would the difference in the two potential electric energies be the work it takes to move q2 to infinity?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    2.4 KB · Views: 498
Physics news on Phys.org
r_swayze said:
Four charges are arranged at the corners of a rectangle as shown in the diagram. How much work needs to be done to move the charge q2 to infinity?

Since change in PEe = W, am I suppose to find total potential electric energy of the four charges and then subtract the total potential electric energy of the three charges without q2? Would the difference in the two potential electric energies be the work it takes to move q2 to infinity?

That would work, but it's easier to calculate the potential from the 3 non-moving charges at the position where q2 is.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top