Wind Mill Damage: Calculating New CG

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeus1216gw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Damage Wind
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the new center of gravity (CG) of the windmill after two blades broke, the weighted average of the CG positions of the remaining components must be determined. The hub weighs 45,000 lbs and the remaining blade weighs 14,000 lbs, while the broken blades are no longer considered. The calculation involves identifying the CG location of the remaining blade and the hub. The total weight of the remaining structure is 59,000 lbs, and the new CG will shift towards the remaining blade. Understanding the physics principles behind CG calculation is essential for accurate results.
zeus1216gw
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a weird question that I can't figure out where to start. It's been a while since physics:

A wind mill has a hub and 3 blades the hub weights 45000 lbs and each blade weighs 14000 lbs. the CG is at the hub when the assembly is intact.

We had a storm and 2 of the 3 blades broke so where is the new CG? i can't remember how to figure this out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The position of the center of gravity is the weighted average of the positions of the centers of gravity of the remaining pieces.

The weight being the mass of each piece, of course.

So your first challenge is to figure out the location of the center of gravity of the remaining arm.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top