Two Resistance Problems (Circuits)

AI Thread Summary
A 480-Ω resistor was mistakenly soldered in place of a 320-Ω resistor in a circuit, and the discussion seeks a solution without removing components. For the second problem, two resistors in series consume a quarter of the power compared to when they are in parallel, with one resistor valued at 1.6 kΩ. The calculations for both problems reveal confusion, particularly with the first problem's resistance value, which should be 420-Ω instead of 480-Ω. The power equations for series and parallel configurations are discussed, emphasizing the need for careful reading of the problem statements. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying circuit formulas to arrive at accurate solutions.
AngeloG
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


15. (II) A close inspection of an electrical circuit reveals that a 480-Ω resistor was inadvertently soldered in the place where a 320-Ω resistor is needed. How can this be fixed without removing anything from the existing circuit?

16. (II) Two resistors when connected in series to a 110-V line use one fourth the power that is used when they are connected in parallel. If one resistor is 1.6-kΩ, what is the resistance of the other?

Homework Equations


P=IV
V=IR
Rt (series) = R1+R1...
Rt (paralell) = (1/R1 + 1/R2...)^-1

The Attempt at a Solution


http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/3694/problems1mf2.th.jpg

This isn't homework; just going through every problem in my Physics book for the upcoming exam =p.

For 15, the back of the book says it's 960-Ω, not sure why? I'm getting a different answer. Maybe someone can clarify as to why.

For 16, I'm pretty sure I did it completely wrong heh =p.

P=IV, I = V / Rt

P(series) = 4*P(parallel)

(V/Rts) * V = 4*[ (V/Rtp) * V ]
Rts = 1600-Ω + x-Ω
Rtp = [(1/1600-Ω) + (1/x-Ω) ]^-1

V^2 / Rts = 4*[V^2/Rtp]

Solving for X, Maple spits out --> -1400-200*I*sqrt(15), -1400+200*I*sqrt(15) Which both seems extremely highly unlikely =p.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well for question 15, you used 420 ohms instead of 480 ohms in your calculation!
 
Last edited:
Doh! Haha, that could be the problem =p.

It helps to read carefully :s.
 
I read it as P(series) = 0.25*P(parallel), which is the other way around from what you have. I have a solution, here's how I set it up:

For series circuit:

Since the current will be the same in both resistors, the power can be expressed as

P = I^2R = I_s^2(R_1 + R_2) where Is is the current in the series circuit.

For the parallel circuit:

The voltage across each resistor will be the same, so the total power will be (with a little simplifying)

P_p =\frac{V^2}{R_1} + \frac{V^2}{R_2} = \frac{V^2(R_1+R_2)}{R_1R_2}

You will also need to use the relation V=I_sR_T = I_s (R_1+R_2)

Since the power used by the series circuit is 0.25 that of the parallel, you can relate the two expressions and solve for R2. No Maple should be needed!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top